By Ilyse Wolens Schuman, © Littler Mendelson
Various federal agencies, including the Department of Labor’s Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA), have issued a proposal to permit health plan sponsors to provide coverage for limited-scope vision, dental, wraparound and employee assistance programs (EAPs) consistent with the qualifications for "excepted benefits."
Generally, HIPAA excepted benefits are exempt from certain statutory requirements, including those insurance market reforms recently enacted by the Affordable Care Act (ACA). According to the proposal, these amendments “would help employees by continuing to maintain their access to health coverage that new requirements could constrain.”
The proposed rule’s overview explains that following the ACA’s enactment, employers asked the agencies charged with enforcing the excepted benefit regulations to remove conditions for limited-scope vision and dental benefits to be treated as excepted benefits. They argued that employers providing such benefits on a self-insured basis and without any employee contributions should not have to start requiring employees to contribute a nominal fee for the benefits in order to qualify as excepted.
Additionally, employers that provide such benefits through a separate benefits policy are not currently required to charge a premium in order for the benefits to be considered excepted. Therefore, to address these concerns and “to level the playing field between insured and self-insured coverage,” the agencies are proposing to “eliminate the requirement under the HIPAA regulations that participants pay an additional premium or contribution for limited-scope vision or dental benefits to qualify as benefits that are not an integral part of a plan (and therefore as excepted benefits).”
In addition, the proposed rule would amend regulations addressing certain wraparound coverage provided under a group health plan to participants “who could receive such benefits through their group health plan if they could afford the premiums, but who do not enroll in the employer-sponsored plan because the premium is unaffordable under the law.” The proposal would render certain wraparound coverage exempt from HIPAA and ACA market reform requirements. The proposal sets forth a number of conditions that must be met before wraparound coverage qualifies as excepted benefits.
Finally, the proposal includes criteria for EAPs to be deemed excepted benefits. According to the EBSA, employers voiced concern that compliance with the ACA’s prohibition on annual limits could be difficult “as such benefits are typically very limited, and that EAPs generally are intended to provide benefits in addition to those provided under other group health plans sponsored by employers.” To this end, the proposed rule sets forth conditions for EAPs to qualify as excepted benefits beginning in 2015.
Among other requests for input, the agencies are asking interested parties the following:
- How many employers offer coverage that provides minimum value and is affordable for a majority of the employees who are eligible for coverage?
- What is the total number of individuals who are eligible for primary plan coverage that provides minimum value and is affordable for a majority of eligible employees, but would not find it affordable?
- To what extent would this proposed rule cause employers to drop health insurance coverage or avoid newly offering it, and what is the dollar value associated with such dropped coverage?
- To what extent would wrap-around coverage be offered more widely as a result of this rule, and what is the average dollar value associated with such coverage?
- To what extent would premiums for relatively generous health coverage change in the presence and in the absence of this rule?
The comment deadline is Feb, 24, 2014. Comments must be identified by the phrase “Excepted Benefits,” and may be submitted through the federal eRulemaking portal.
Ilyse Wolens Schuman is a member of the government affairs practice at the law firm Littler Mendelson and works with employers in multiple industries. © 2013 Littler Mendelson. All rights reserved. Republished with permission.
Related External Articles: