New Member Promotion >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Giving applicants with criminal backgrounds a fair chance at employment can be good for business.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Apply for the SHRM Certification Exam and begin advancing your career.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
But some coverage requriements still apply to plans existing when the statute became law
Understanding and interpreting the sweeping 2010 health care reform law should include an understanding of the “grandfathering” provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law on March 23, 2010, as amended one week later by the Health Care & Education Affordability Reconciliation Act.
The grandfathering relief allows certain plans in effect on the reform act's enactment date to avoid many of the new rules. Nevertheless, there are some health care reform provisions that do apply to grandfathered plans. Therefore, it is important not only to understand what makes a plan “grandfathered” but also to distinguish between those provisions that are and are not applicable to grandfathered plans.
Grandfathered Plans Defined
A “grandfathered health plan” is any group health plan or individual coverage that was in effect on the date of the new law’s enactment. Even if an individual may re-enroll in a grandfathered health plan or new employees (and their families) may be added to the plan after March 23, 2010, the plan’s grandfathered status continues.
Likewise, an individual who was covered by a grandfathered health plan may add his or her dependents to the plan after March 23, 2010, without negating the plan’s grandfathered status as long as the plan allowed for dependent/family coverage on March 23, 2010. It was not clear immediately whether a significant modification of coverage under a plan design would alter its grandfathered status.
Separately, collectively bargained multi-employer and single-employer plans in effect on March 23, 2010, are not subject to the reform law rules (as amended by the reconciliation act) until the date on which the last of the collective bargaining agreements relating to the coverage terminates. At that time, a collectively bargained plan is then subject to health care reform rules and, assuming that it remains grandfathered (based on the rules then in effect), it would have to comply with the requirements for grandfathered plans.
The reform law provides, however, that a collectively bargained plan is permitted to be amended early for some or all of the law’s rules. This voluntary amendment will not be treated as a termination of the collective bargaining agreement that might otherwise subject the plan to an earlier compliance deadline.
Provisions Applicable to Grandfathered Plans
Although grandfathered plans are generally able to avoid the application of many of the new law’s requirements, some key health coverage access and reform provisions will still apply to non-collectively-bargained grandfathered health plans. In reviewing these rules, it is important to focus on the effective dates. Some are effective with the first plan year that begins on or after Sept. 23, 2010, (e.g., six months after enactment of the reform law). That means Jan. 1, 2011, for calendar year plan years. Other provisions are effective for plan years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2014.
The following provisions are generally effective
Jan. 1, 2011, for calendar year grandfathered plans (technically effective for plan years beginning on or after Sept. 23, 2010):
The following provisions are generally effective
Jan. 1, 2014,for calendar year grandfathered plans:
Provisions Not Applicable to Grandfathered Plans
Although the reconciliation act subjects grandfathered health plans to various reform law requirements, there are still some key requirements that continue
not to apply to grandfathered health plans. Some of the key provisions are:
Of course there are many other provisions that would not apply to grandfathered plans, and this list is not meant to be exhaustive.
Paul M. Hamburger is a partner and Washington, D.C. head of the
Proskauer Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation & ERISA Litigation Practice Center.
James R. Napoli is a senior counsel in the Practice Center, and resident in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. Both are members of the recently launched
Proskauer Health Care Group.
Proskauer is an international law firm providing a wide variety of legal services to clients worldwide in all areas of employment law.
Republished with permission. © 2010
Proskauer Rose LLP. All rights reserved.
Editor’s Note: This article should not be construed as legal advice.
Health Care Reform Law Has Numerous New Deadlines, SHRM Online Legal Issues, April 2010
SHRM Online Benefits Discipline
SHRM Online Health Care Reform web page
Sign up for SHRM’s free
Compensation & Benefits e-newsletter
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies