Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Here is how HR can help prevent the missteps that could cost your company big in court.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
Except for tobacco-cessation, wellness incentives cost won't figure into minimum value calculation
Update: A final rule,
Minimum Value of Eligible Employer-Sponsored Plans and Other Rules Regarding the Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit, was published by the IRS in the
Federal Register on Dec. 18, 2015.
On May 3, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service published in the
Federal Register a
proposed rule that provides additional guidance on what constitutes the
minimum value (MV) of an employer-sponsored health plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) for purposes of eligibility for a premium tax credit.
Under the PPACA’s pay-or-play employer responsibility provisions, beginning in January 2015 an employer with 50 or more employees will be subject to a penalty if any employee receives a premium tax credit to purchase health insurance through a public health insurance exchange (or marketplace), scheduled to launch in October 2013. Individuals are not, however, entitled to receive a premium tax credit if they are eligible to receive employer-provided coverage that is affordable and provides MV.
As outlined in
final regulations issued in February 2013, a plan will be deemed to provide MV if the percentage of the total allowed costs of benefits provided under the plan is not less than 60 percent. In order to determine whether a plan provides MV, an employer-sponsored plan may use the
MV calculator provided by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the IRS, or avail itself of “an array of design-based safe-harbors published by HHS and the IRS in the form of checklists to determine whether the plan provides MV.”
Plan designs meeting the following specifications are proposed as safe harbors for determining MV if the plans cover all of the benefits included in the MV calculator:
Safe Harbor Clarification
According to the IRS, commenters “sought clarification of the health benefits considered in determining the share of benefit costs paid by a plan.”
The proposed IRS rule provides additional guidance for making the MV determination. According to the proposal, employer-sponsored self-insured and insured large group plans are not required “to cover every [essential health benefits (EHB)] category or conform their plans to an EHB benchmark that applies to qualified health plans.” To this end, the new proposed regulations “provide that MV is based on the anticipated spending for a standard population. The plan’s anticipated spending for benefits provided under any particular EHB-benchmark plan for any state counts towards MV.”
Health Savings Accounts
With respect to health savings accounts (HSAs), the proposal explains:
all amounts contributed by an employer for the current plan year to an HSA are taken into account in determining the plan’s share of costs for purposes of MV and are treated as amounts available for first dollar coverage. Amounts newly made available under an HRA that is integrated with an eligible employer-sponsored plan for the current plan year count for purposes of MV in the same manner if the amounts may be used only for cost-sharing and may not be used to pay insurance premiums.
The proposal also addresses wellness program incentives. Specifically, the proposal states that:
A plan’s share of costs for MV purposes is determined without regard to reduced cost-sharing available under a nondiscriminatory wellness program. However, for nondiscriminatory wellness programs designed to prevent or reduce tobacco use, MV may be calculated assuming that every eligible individual satisfies the terms of the program relating to prevention or reduction of tobacco use.
Similarly, the proposed rule provides that the affordability of an employer-sponsored plan is determined by assuming that each employee fails to satisfy the requirements of a wellness program, except the requirements of a nondiscriminatory wellness program related to tobacco use. The IRS does provide transition relief from these provisions for plan years beginning before Jan. 1, 2015.
Finally, the proposal includes guidance on other miscellaneous issues, including the definition of modified adjusted gross income, retiree coverage, rating areas, coverage for newborns and adoptees, adjusted monthly premium for family members enrolled for less than a full month, premium assistance amount for partial months of coverage, family members residing at different locations, and additional benefits and applicable benchmark plan.
Ilyse Schuman is a shareholder in the Washington, D.C., office of
Littler Mendelson. She provides strategic counsel and representation to clients on a broad array of workplace issues and developments in Congress and executive branch federal agencies. © 2013 Littler Mendelson. All rights reserved. Republished with permission.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Don’t Lose Sight! What Does Poor Preventive Care Cost Your Business?
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies