Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Change can be scary, but deploying new HR software doesn't have to be.
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
We don’t just visit a city, we take it over. Join the HR community in NOLA -- June 18-21, 2017.
The Employment, Parental Leave and Other Measures Act 2013 (the Act) makes significant changes to the Singapore Employment Act (EA), extending protection for workers and improving employment standards, while recognizing that employers have practical business concerns and a need to remain competitive. The Act also introduces certain amendments to the Child Development Co-Savings Act (CDCA). These changes are the outcome of public consultation and evaluation by employers, unions and the Singapore government.
Most of the changes, with the exception of Section 45 of the EA relating to retrenchment benefits, took effect on April 1, 2014.
Key amendments to the EA include:
Extending EA Protection to More Workers
The salary threshold for employees other than workmen, such as clerical staff and frontline service staff, to be covered under the working hours and rest day-related provisions contained in Part IV of the EA will be raised from a basic monthly salary of $2,000 to $2,500, in line with recent increases in salary levels across Singapore. The Ministry of Manpower (MOM) estimates this change will benefit approximately 150,000 workers.
In addition to the salary protection currently accorded to them, professionals, managers, and executives (PMEs) earning a basic monthly salary of up to $4,500 will now be covered under the general provisions of the EA, including sick-leave benefits and protection against unfair dismissal. MOM estimates this will benefit approximately 300,000 PMEs.
A 25 percent sub-cap has been introduced for deductions to employees’ salaries for accommodation, amenities and services, to prevent excessive deductions from their salaries. This new sub-cap is within the existing 50 percent total cap of an employee’s salary for authorized deductions.
Beginning April 1, 2015, the noneligibility period for retrenchment benefits for otherwise eligible workers will be reduced to two years from three years, in line with shorter employment tenures. Note, however, that no minimum statutory amount for benefits has been introduced, and the current practice of leaving these benefits to be agreed between employers, employees and unions will continue. PMEs will continue to receive no statutory retrenchment benefits and will have to rely on contractual entitlements, if any.
Previously, in the event of a transfer of business, unions could represent employees transferred to another company only if the pre-existing collective agreement with the original employer remained valid. To provide greater reassurance for affected employees, the validity of the collective agreement will now be extended for 18 months after the date of transfer, or until the expiry of the collective agreement, whichever is later.
Reducing Rigidity and Augmenting Flexibility for Employers
Previously, nonworkmen earning up to $2,000 and workmen earning up to $4,500 could claim overtime pay. After the amendments, the salary threshold of nonworkmen will be increased to $2,500. However, the overtime rate payable for nonworkmen will be capped at the salary level of $2,250, to help employers manage costs.
PMEs earning up to $4,500 will need to have served with the same employer for at least 12 months to be eligible to seek redress against unfair dismissal, where notice is given. This will provide employers time to assess suitability of the PMEs for their jobs.
Employers will be allowed the additional option to grant time-off in lieu for PMEs who are required to work on public holidays, subject to mutual agreement. In the absence of mutual agreement, at least half a day off in lieu has to be granted.
Employers will not be obliged to grant paid sick leave and bear medical examination expenses of employees for cosmetic consultations and procedures. The assessment of whether a treatment is cosmetic or not would be based on the opinion of the medical practitioner performing the examination and providing the medical certificate.
Enhancing Enforcement of and Compliance with Employment Standards
The penalty for failure to pay salary in accordance with the EA will be raised. A minimum fine is introduced and the maximum fine increased. A first-time offense will be liable to a fine of between $3,000 and $15,000 and/or six months’ jail. A subsequent offense will be liable to a fine of between $6,000 and $30,000 and/or 12 months’ jail.
The maximum composition fine will be increased from $1,000 to $5,000.
Employment inspectors will be granted the power to arrest any person whom they reasonably believe is guilty of a failure to pay salary. They will also be allowed to enter any workplace to conduct checks.
Individuals such as directors or partners of companies will be made more accountable for EA offenses committed by the company. Such individuals who are primarily responsible for the offense and have failed to exercise reasonable supervision or oversight will be presumed to be negligent and be held liable. The individual will be able to rebut the presumption by proving that he or she had exercised reasonable supervision or oversight to avoid commission of the EA offense.
Marriage and Parenthood-Related Amendments
The CDCA has been updated by the Act to accurately reflect the policy that parents’ total child care and extended child care leave is based on their youngest qualifying Singapore citizen child under the CDCA. This is to avoid situations where parents who have both an older citizen child and a younger noncitizen child double claim leave under both the EA and the CDCA.
A new formula has been introduced under both the EA and the CDCA to compute the minimum number of days of maternity, paternity, shared parental or adoption leave an employee is entitled to take in circumstances where there is mutual agreement between employer and employee for leave to be taken flexibly by days instead of by block week. This will provide greater certainty for both employers and employees.
The MOM has embarked on a second phase of employment legislation reviews to consider, including:
David Longstaff is a partner and Elaine Ho is an associate at
Jones Day, based in Singapore.
Republished with permission. © 2014 Jones Day.
SHRM Online Global HR page
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies