Not yet a Member?
HR Magazine is highlighting the next generation of HR leaders.
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
30+ HR education programs, including 4 NEW programs on hot topics, are available for registration.
Join us in Chicago for the latest trends and technology in talent management, and what to expect in the future.
Karen S. Elliott
The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) wants the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to provide employers with guidance and clarification regarding a federal law on acquisition of genetic information of employees and their dependents.
Planned regulations, which the EEOC must issue by May 21, 2009, relate to Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA). Congress passed GINA in May 2008 to prohibit genetic information discrimination by health insurers and employers against employees and their dependents.
Congress crafted the legislation because of a belief that individuals were forgoing genetic tests that might show them that they were at risk for certain medical conditions and that employers or insurers might use that information against them, according to Christopher J. Kuczynski, assistant legal counsel for the federal government’s Americans with Disabilities Act policy division.
He and SHRM member Karen S. Elliott—an attorney with Gregory Kaplan, PLC, who has served as SHRM’s Virginia State Legislative Director—were among six panelists appearing before the EEOC during a two-hour public hearing Feb. 25, 2009.
The hearing kicked off a 60-day public comment period on the proposed rule-making for GINA.
SHRM is one of the founding members of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination in Employment Coalition and has supported GINA’s passage, according to Elliott.
However, the regulation allows six exceptions to keeping that information confidential, and SHRM is concerned that employers could find themselves possessing genetic information involuntarily through the normal course of the workday or a casual inquiry to an employee returning from sick leave, said Elliott.
“The interplay of GINA, the ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act] and HIPAA [Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act] creates significant complexities for HR professionals,” she pointed out in her statement.
Involuntary acquisition of genetic information, she said, must be differentiated clearly from capturing such information purposefully for discriminatory purposes. The EEOC’s rulemaking can help achieve this balance, said Elliott, who advises HR professionals regularly on issues related to discrimination, health care and privacy issues.
She asked the EEOC to provide employers with guidance “on situations that do not fall squarely into the exceptions enumerated in the statute.”
Those exceptions, according to Kuczynski, are:
“GINA’s list of enumerated exceptions is far from a complete picture of the ways in which an employer may, willingly or unwillingly, receive genetic information about an employee or family member for an employee,” such as in a doctor’s excuse for an employee’s absence, Elliott said in a written statement.
SHRM is “hopeful” she said, that the EEOC can address “innocent or inadvertent acquisitions of genetic information.”
Also making comment before the EEOC:
“GINA is an important piece of legislation,” acting EEOC vice chair Christine M. Griffin said via teleconferencing. She called public comment on the Notice of Proposed Rule Making “a critical part of that process” to ensure that Congress’ intent “is properly carried out through our regulations.”
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies