Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018.
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 14 cities across the U.S. this fall.
Gain the skills you need to rise to the next level in your career. Jon us at SHRM's Leadership Development Forum, October 2-3 in Boston.
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
SHRM Supports Employer Representation by Non-Attorneys in Unemployment Compensation Hearings in Illinois Court Case
Alexandria, Va. - On Friday, March 27, 2009, SHRM filed an amicus brief in the Illinois Appellate Court case
Grafner v. Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES).
In the initial unemployment compensation hearing, the petitioner was represented by counsel and the employer was represented by a non-attorney. When the petitioner’s unemployment compensation was denied, she challenged the decision arguing that since the employer was not represented by an attorney, the hearing was invalid. The Illinois Bar Association supported the petitioner’s case by filing a separate brief arguing that an employer’s representation by a non-attorney in unemployment compensation hearings amounts to the unauthorized practice of law.
SHRM’s amicus brief argued that unemployment proceedings are not judicial proceedings and that the long-standing practice of non-lawyer representation of both parties in informal unemployment compensation proceedings should not be considered the unauthorized practice of law.
SHRM made similar arguments in two cases decided by the Pennsylvania courts in 2007. In the Pennsylvania cases
(Piunti v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
Harkness v. Unemployment Compensation Review Board) the courts ruled that non-attorneys
may represent employers in unemployment compensation proceedings.
The Illinois State Council for SHRM, along with the National Federation of Independent Business Small Business Legal Center, Metropolitan Chicago Healthcare Council, Illinois Manufacturers’ Association, Association of Unemployment Tax Organizations, and UWC-Strategic Services on Unemployment and Workers’ Compensation joined SHRM’s amicus brief in the
SHRM’s amicus brief in the
Grafner case is available
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies