Finally get that promotion? Get exclusive content, tips and tools to help you excel.
Implicit bias occurs when individuals make judgments about people based on gender, race or other prohibited factors without even realizing they’re doing it.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
For Immediate Release
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Maryland Fair Share Health Care Fund Act is Preempted by ERISA
(Alexandria, Va., January 18, 2007)— On January 17, 2007, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Maryland Fair Share Health Care Fund Act is preempted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). The Fourth Circuit concluded that the Act would require employers to restructure their health insurance plans, and thus, conflict with ERISA’s goal to permit the nationally uniform administration of employee benefit plans.
The law, which was due to become effective at the beginning of this year, required private companies located in Maryland and with more than 10,000 to spend at least 8 percent of total wages paid to employees for health insurance costs. If employers did not comply with the Act, they would be required to pay the Maryland Secretary of Labor, Licensing and Regulation the difference between the employer’s actual health insurance costs and the required 8 percent.
“This decision is welcomed news for both employers and employees,” said Susan Meisinger, president and chief executive officer for SHRM. “SHRM has strongly supported ERISA and its employer-sponsored health care plans being governed exclusively by federal law instead of 50 separate states.”
In March 2006, SHRM filed an amicus brief in the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA) case in the U.S. District Court of Maryland. The court ruled in favor of SHRM’s argument that the Maryland Fair Share Health Care Fund Act is preempted by ERISA. The State of Maryland appealed and SHRM filed another amicus brief, once again challenging the Maryland Act.
For more information or to view a copy of the amicus brief challenging Maryland’s Fair Share Health Care Fund Act submitted by SHRM, the HR Policy Association, and the American Benefits Council, visit SHRM Government Affairs Online at http://www.shrm.org/government/ .
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
HR Education in a City Near You
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies