SHRM: Proposed Changes to Overtime Regulations Will Do More Harm than Good

Workers reclassified as nonexempt would face limits to overtime, flexibility, opportunities for experience and professional status, SHRM tells DOL

Sep 3, 2015
Reuse Permissions

WASHINGTON — Far more employees are likely to experience negative consequences as a result of proposed changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) overtime regulations than benefit from them, the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) said in comments submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL).

The proposed regulations would raise the salary threshold at which an employee is eligible to be classified as exempt from $23,660 to $50,440.

According to the DOL, more than 3.5 million workers who earn less than the proposed salary threshold do not regularly work overtime — or more than 40 hours in a week. Although they are the employees most likely to be reclassified as nonexempt under the proposed regulation, they won’t benefit from the change. Instead, they are likely to experience negative consequences of reclassification — limited or no access to overtime, reduced workplace flexibility and access to opportunities to gain experience and a loss of professional status.

In a new survey conducted by SHRM, 70 percent of respondents said it was likely that their employees who are reclassified under the new regulation would have fewer opportunities to work overtime.

According to the SHRM survey of HR professionals, 67 percent said that, if the proposed regulation lead to an increase in eligibility for overtime pay, it was likely that employees would have decreased flexibility and autonomy. A limit on workplace flexibility is a reason why many employees view reclassification a demotion.

SHRM agrees that it is time to update the salary threshold, but believes the proposed increase is too large. More than doubling the salary threshold would significantly impact employers and employees and would disproportionately affect non-profits, as well as employers and workers in geographic areas with lower costs of living and income.

“While DOL’s proposal acknowledges that the proposed rule may have some adverse effect on employees, the consequences of reclassification are not considered in any depth,” Mike Aitken, SHRM’s vice president of government affairs, wrote in the comments. “Of course, the department could mitigate the impact of these negative consequences by more appropriately setting the salary threshold so that it serves as a reasonable proxy for those employees unlikely to pass the duties test.”

SHRM’s 50 state councils and 300 local SHRM chapters have signed the comments SHRM submitted to DOL. In addition, about 900 individual SHRM members have shared their comments with the department.

To read the full comments, visit

MEDIA: For more information, contact Kate Kennedy at and 703-535-6260 or at 703-535-6072.

About the Society for Human Resource Management

Founded in 1948, the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) is the world’s largest HR membership organization devoted to human resource management. Representing more than 275,000 members in over 160 countries, the Society is the leading provider of resources to serve the needs of HR professionals and advance the professional practice of human resource management. SHRM has more than 575 affiliated chapters within the United States and subsidiary offices in China, India and United Arab Emirates. Visit us at and follow us on Twitter @SHRMPress.

Reuse Permissions


HR Education in a City Near You

Find a Seminar

Job Finder

Find an HR Job Near You


Find the Right Vendor for Your HR Needs

SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies

Search & Connect