Not yet a Member?
HR Magazine is highlighting the next generation of HR leaders.
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
Join us in Chicago for the latest trends and technology in talent management, and what to expect in the future.
How to audit your independent contractor classifications before the DOL does.
Using independent contractors can be a good way for companies to meet their business goals. But these days, doing so is akin to putting a neon target on your back. As the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) seeks to convert as many contractors as possible to employees, many companies that use independent contractors are facing a very real threat.
Addressing misclassification has become a key government priority. Indeed, DOL spokeswoman Mary Beth Maxwell recently called the misclassification of workers as something other than employees—typically as independent contractors—a “serious problem for affected employees and employers, and to the economy.”
Moreover, the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division continues to focus with great urgency on misclassification. In recent years, it has launched many related investigations and lawsuits.
So how does the DOL intend to forcibly convert independent contractors to employees—and what can you do about it?
The DOL and
IRS are working together and sharing information to identify potential misclassification of employees. Their goal is to increase tax revenue and investigate compliance with federal labor laws.
In addition, the DOL is targeting specific industries that will bear the brunt of its increased attention, including energy, construction, home health care, child care, transportation, parking, warehousing, and meat and poultry processing—basically any industry in which labor is not closely controlled by management and independent contractors may be needed. Many experts believe the construction and energy sectors will be scrutinized the most closely.
An investigation will most likely begin with an opening letter, which is often delivered in person by a DOL investigator. The letter will seek detailed information regarding your company, its finances, and its payroll and operating practices. And, in typical government fashion, you’ll be given little if any time to formulate a precise response.
The initial visit from an investigator often seems friendly and nonthreatening, but employers shouldn’t be lulled into a false sense of security.
What starts as a benign inquiry can spiral out of an employer’s control. Within weeks, a company that believes it is cooperating may face a demand for millions of dollars in back pay.
Unfortunately, even when independent contractor relationships are solidly established under the law, the DOL could still determine that the contractors are employees.
But don’t lose heart: If your company is confident in its position, an unfavorable administrative decision does not have to be a death knell to your business. Employers have the right, and now the precedent, to fight back.
When the DOL came knocking and cited Texas company
Gate Guard Services L.P. (GGS) with a $6 million penalty for allegedly misclassifying its gate attendants as independent contractors, GGS refused to pay and instead filed its own lawsuit against the DOL in federal court—which the company won in 2014. This was a significant victory for companies that rely on independent contractors. The DOL, on the other hand, suffered a substantial loss: its appearance of invincibility when pursuing alleged “employee misclassification” actions under the
Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
Not only do employers have the right to fight back, but they may collect all or part of their attorney fees from the DOL. GGS was awarded over $500,000 because the federal district court found that the DOL was “not substantially justified” in pursuing litigation against the company.
However, the DOL has rarely lost an independent contractor misclassification case in federal court. One reason for this is that the department has virtually unlimited resources available. Most companies decide to capitulate rather than contest the case, either because they lack the financial means to fight back or they don’t realize that they can.
If your company relies on independent contractors and has not yet been investigated by the federal government, be proactive in auditing your use of independent contractors and prepare a response in advance.
Once you’ve determined the classifications to be legal, review and update independent contractor agreements—and follow them. Although they do not conclusively establish independent contractor status, these agreements are an important factor in determining who is an independent contractor. The agreements should state that the business lacks control over the means by which the worker performs his or her duties, that the term of the agreement is on a project-by-project basis, and that both parties intend the worker to be an independent contractor. The agreements should also establish that the worker:
You should enter into a new agreement for each project assigned and also should conduct a classification audit with your employment counsel. Performing an FLSA classification audit will help you identify potential FLSA compliance problems before the DOL does and mitigate the risk that you’ll be audited by the IRS, the DOL, or any other federal or state agency. It may also create a good-faith defense to a liquidated damages claim for businesses that believe that their pay practices comply with the FLSA.
Finally, ensure that your company is treating its independent contractors as true contractors. Do not provide them with job descriptions, business cards, computers, office space or training; instead, insist that they provide most of their own equipment. Do not control the work; instead, allow the contractor to decide how the work will be performed. While companies can and should insist on safety and quality control measures, make sure you communicate that these directives are for safety purposes and to ensure that the customer receives a quality service or product.
So be prepared. Be proactive. Structure your business appropriately with the help of knowledgeable counsel. And do not be afraid to fight back if you are in the right.
Annette A. Idalski is an attorney with Chamberlain Hrdlicka in Atlanta and can be reached at
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies