This Month Only! >> $20 off and a FREE SHRM tote with your membership and code TOTE2018!
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
In addition to the payment, the company agreed to hire the applicant, Donald Teaford, as a mason utility laborer, commission officials announced Feb. 11, 2011.
The commission charged that Hussey Copper Ltd. in Leetsdale, Pa., violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by refusing to hire Teaford. Refusing to hire a qualified individual because of his disability or record of disability or because the employer perceives him as disabled violates the act, according to the EEOC.
In 2007, the company offered Teaford a job as a production laborer, contingent on his passing a physical examination and a drug test. His urine sample tested positive for methadone, according to court documents. When the company’s doctor questioned him, Teaford acknowledged he was taking methadone, which had been prescribed by a doctor to treat his dependency on opiates. The company then rescinded the job offer, mistakenly concluding that Teaford was a safety risk due to his methadone treatments, according to the commission.
Teaford was qualified for the position and was not experiencing any side effects from the methadone treatments, EEOC lawyers argued. In addition, the treatment program officials provided the company’s doctor with information verifying Teaford’s successful participation in the program, they said.
“Methadone treatment is one of the most monitored and regulated medical treatments in the United States,” said Spencer H. Lewis, a regional director of the commission based in Philadelphia. “This case should remind all employers that the ADA requires employers to make individualized assessments about an individual’s ability to do the job instead of acting out of speculative fears or biases.”
When used as prescribed and under a physician’s supervision, methadone is safe, according to a fact sheet published by the President’s Office of National Drug Control Policy.
“Methadone does not impair cognitive functions. It has no adverse effects on mental capability, intelligence, or employability. It is not sedating or intoxicating, nor does it interfere with ordinary activities such as driving a car or operating machinery,” the fact sheet states.
Rejecting the company’s motion for summary judgment in March 2010, a U.S. District Court judge said EEOC lawyers raised legitimate questions about whether the company conducted an individual assessment of Teaford to provide objective medical evidence that he posed a threat to himself or others. It is the employer’s burden to make such assessments of employees or applicants, Judge Nora Barry Fischer stated.
In this case, the commission established that the company’s doctor didn’t ask Teaford whether the methadone affected his cognitive functions, didn’t personally examine him and didn’t consult with Teaford’s doctor from the drug treatment program, the judge stated.
After a three-day trial, company lawyers agreed to settle the case. As part of a five-year consent decree, Hussey Copper agreed to revise its policies prohibiting discrimination, provide anti-discrimination training to employees and set up procedures for prompt investigations of any complaints.
A spokesperson for Hussey Copper wasn’t available for comment.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies