We're celebrating 10 Days of Membership! Today's Gift: $20 off your professional membership with promo 10DAYS20OFF
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Develop your HR competencies and knowledge in-person in 12 U.S. cities or virtually.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
HR professionals often share with each other the common mistakes managers make. In the many conversations I’ve had with colleagues, as well as my first-hand experience, I’ve noticed the following common, easily avoided land mines:
The pre-emptive strike. Too many managers don’t want to take their problems “outside the family” and share their concerns with HR or some other neutral party. Instead, they hog all the problems and sometimes go as far as pressuring team members not to go to HR to file a complaint—even threatening to fire them if they do.
“That’s a major no-no,” says Ann Kotlarski, senior litigation partner at Seyfarth Shaw LLC in Century City, Calif. “Stating that you will retaliate against anyone who lodges a good-faith complaint with the company’s ombudsman could very well land a supervisor on the sharp end of the investigation spear. Outright termination or at least a final written warning could be warranted, even for a first offense.”
In addition, remember that workers are well-educated consumers. A poor performer may launch a pre-emptive strike over the supervisor’s conduct—typically using terms like harassment, discrimination and retaliation—before the supervisor has a chance to complain about her performance. The strategy is to complain about the supervisor so that any discipline or termination looks like retaliation. Supervisors should run, not walk, to the HR department when they’ve got a performance problem on their hands, Kotlarski recommends.
Talking “off the record.” There’s no such thing. Anytime an employee wants to speak with you “off the record” or in strict confidence, give the following caveat: “I’d be happy to help you, but I can’t keep the matter confidential if it has to do with discrimination or harassment, potential violence in the workplace, or a potential conflict of interest with the company’s operations. In those cases, I’ll have an affirmative obligation to disclose what you tell me to other members of management.”
“Remember,” Kotlarski advises, “once the employee puts you on notice as a supervisor within the company, it’s the same in the eyes of the law as if he or she put the CEO on notice. Should a lawsuit ensue, the plaintiff attorney will argue that the company was placed on notice and failed to act, meaning the supervisor not only speaks for the company but is the company in matters like these.”
Performance vs. conduct. Most managers know to follow the steps of progressive discipline before terminating someone for cause. Issuing verbal, written and final written warnings is the norm in most organizations. “What many managers fail to remember, however, is that the step system outlined in most organizations’ corrective action policies typically speaks only to performance and attendance, not to conduct,” Kotlarski notes. “Conduct-related infractions often result in what’s known as a ‘summary offense,’ or immediate dismissal for cause” (think theft or embezzlement).
In addition, egregious misconduct or insubordination often results in a final written warning—even for a first offense—meaning that supervisors don’t have to put up with bad attitudes and inappropriate public displays of anger or resentment under the three-step corrective process. Instead, they can proceed directly to a final written warning, stating that if the individual ever again engages in inappropriate conduct of that sort, immediate dismissal may result.
Sameness vs. consistency. Many front-line leaders often assume that all infractions have to be treated exactly the same.
“They absolutely do not,” Kotlarski says. “Your responsibility as a leader lies in looking at the totality of events and considering the backgrounds of the individuals involved—tenure, performance record, etc.—to ensure a reasonable outcome.”
For example, sleeping on the job is a serious infraction. But while a recruiter may receive a written warning, a nurse working the graveyard shift at an emergency room’s main desk may receive a final written warning, and an anesthesiologist sleeping during an operation may be terminated without warning. “It’s not the sleeping per se,” Kotlarski explains. “It’s the circumstances surrounding the sleeping that count.”
Land Mine-Free Zone
These workplace wisdoms belong front-and-center in your management arsenal. Learn to recognize potential land mines and how to avoid or disarm them. Know when to call for reinforcement from the HR department. These tales from the trenches will help you become a more consistent manager and a better company representative—one who leads a drama-free work environment clear of employee explosions.
The author is an HR executive and has written several management books, including 101 Sample Write-Ups for Documenting Employee Performance Problems: A Guide to Progressive Discipline and Termination(AMACOM/SHRM, 2010).
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
HR Education in a City Near You
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies