Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
In 20 years of researching trauma, Jennifer Freyd, co-author of Blind to Betrayal: Why We Fool Ourselves We Aren’t Being Fooled (Wiley, 2013), has found that the most toxic trauma results from betrayal by someone trusted.
Betrayal is not limited to personal relationships. Workplaces run on trust between co-workers, between leaders and employees and between employees and the institution. When that trust is broken, it can be hard to overcome. Leaders can help by carefully responding to an employee who reveals a traumatic experience.
Freyd, professor of psychology at the University of Oregon, teaches individuals how to react to traumatic news in a way that fosters healing for those who have been betrayed.
Why is the response to shocking or traumatic news important?
The response can help or hurt. The stakes are high for the person doing the telling. This is particularly true for people who describe being harmed by another person. A blaming or invalidating response can cause a person to suffer greatly—in some cases, it can constitute an even greater betrayal than the initial event.
In contrast, a good response can help people heal. People need to feel believed and respected to heal and maintain self-esteem and personal integrity.
When hearing traumatic news, can leaders respond by just doing what comes naturally at the time?
That depends on their emotional knowledge. It might also hinge on their own trauma history. If they experienced trauma that they haven’t worked out for themselves, they may close others down. Some people get anxious and try to change the topic when they hear an individual talk about an upsetting or stigmatizing situation. Others blame the person who has been traumatized or say they don’t believe him. People may do that to protect themselves but in the process hurt others.
What should leaders do when hearing traumatic news?
Listen respectfully and allow silence; keep eye contact and sit upright or lean forward when listening. Stay calm and supportive. Give advice only when asked.
Say validating things, such as, "If that happened to me, I can imagine I’d feel really overwhelmed, too." Restate the emotion the person is describing, such as, "Wow, that sounds like it was scary for you." Ask for more information. Reflective questions that require more than one-word responses are best. Point out the person’s strengths, such as, "I’m amazed at how much courage that took."
What should they not do?
Don’t discount the information or discredit the speaker. Don’t minimize, but don’t overreact either. Don’t change the subject or ask questions that are off-topic. Focus on the person’s experience, not your own. Avoid making inappropriate facial gestures, such as eye-rolling or eyebrow-raising. Don’t interrupt, but do nod and say little things like "uh-huh" to encourage the person to keep talking.
What should a leader do if an employee is distraught and inconsolable?
Ask the employee how he usually gets support. If it is from a friend or family member, encourage the employee to contact that person. If appropriate, provide a referral to a mental health professional. Do not leave him alone if he is significantly distraught.
You say in your book that nondisclosure of trauma hampers healing. How can leaders encourage employees to feel comfortable enough to disclose?
By showing respect in all areas of employment. Make it clear that the company values hearing about problems in the workplace that could cause trauma as early as possible and that whistle-blowers will be cherished, not punished.
Is it institutional betrayal to punish whistle-blowers?
Yes. Institutions have the power to betray in many ways—including the failure to protect whistle-blowers. When wrongdoings are reported and institutions turn a blind eye, it harms employees.
How can leaders prevent institutional betrayal?
Ask yourself what your company is doing to prevent dishonorable behavior. Are you taking proactive steps? Or are you creating an environment in which this type of experience appears to be no big deal? Are you making it easy or difficult for victims and whistle-blowers to report wrongdoing? Are you responding adequately to reports?
Institutions will benefit from responding well, and so will their employees.
Kathryn Tyler is a freelance writer and former HR generalist and trainer in Wixom, Mich.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies