Finally get that promotion? Get exclusive content, tips and tools to help you excel.
Implicit bias occurs when individuals make judgments about people based on gender, race or other prohibited factors without even realizing they’re doing it.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
The practice of requiring job applicants to take a pre-employment drug test appears to be gaining acceptance from employers, according to a poll released Sept. 7, 2011, by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) and the Drug and Alcohol Testing Industry Association (DATIA).
Fifty-seven percent of the survey participants’ organizations require all job candidates to take a pre-employment drug test, while less than a third (29 percent) do not have a pre-employment drug-testing requirement. The remaining 14 percent of respondents test applicants for safety-sensitive positions and when required by state law.
Nearly 70 percent of the businesses that require testing for all job applicants reported that the policy has been in place for seven years or longer, and 12 percent reported that they have required the tests for five or six years.
“Among the organizations using these testing programs, the tendency is to continue the use of them over relatively long periods of time,” said Mark Schmit, director of research at SHRM. “In addition, organizations are reporting positive impacts related to drug and alcohol testing that supports the efficacy of these programs.”
The poll, which was commissioned by DATIA and conducted by SHRM, surveyed 1,058 randomly selected HR professionals and featured questions about employers’ drug-testing policies and practices. The survey revealed that large organizations tend to be more likely than others to include drug testing in their hiring processes. More than two-thirds (71 percent) of organizations with 2,500 or more employees require all job applicants to take a pre-employment drug test.
Less than 40 percent of businesses with fewer than 100 employees had a drug-testing policy for job candidates. This number increased for medium-sized businesses, with 56 percent of organizations with 100 to 499 employees reporting that they require pre-employment drug testing, followed by 62 percent of businesses with 500 to 2,499 employees. Nearly three-quarters (72 percent) of organizations with multinational operations reported that they use or apply many of the same drug-testing policies in their operations outside the United States.
Nine percent of respondents reported that prior to implementing a drug-testing policy, their organizations had a high rate of employee absenteeism (over 15 percent), compared with just 4 percent of respondents that reported a high rate of absenteeism after initiating a drug-testing policy—a decrease of approximately 50 percent.
Approximately one-fifth of the respondents (19 percent) reported that productivity improved after implementing a drug-testing policy. Six percent of the poll participants reported that their organizations had a high incidence rate (over 6 percent) of workers’ compensation claims after implementing an organizational drug-testing program, compared with 14 percent who reported similar incidence rates before initiating such a policy.
“The poll results show that drug testing may yield a high return on investment by creating a more stable, productive and safe workplace,” said Neil Fortner, chairman-elect for DATIA and the study’s principal investigator.
Bill Leonard is a senior writer for SHRM.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies