New Member Promotion >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Giving applicants with criminal backgrounds a fair chance at employment can be good for business.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Apply for the SHRM Certification Exam and begin advancing your career.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
A well-designed change implementation process anticipates stakeholder interactions and enables the implementation team members to adjust their actions and arguments to match stakeholder reactions.
There are five essential steps in an effective change management planning process. Use these steps to keep the team focused on the dynamics of the change process and not get distracted by the environmental noise that accompanies change.
"Stakeholder identification is key, not only to define who you need to get on board, but to continue to refine and scope out the problem," says Jeff Sabo, senior manager, human resources for Life Technologies, a Carlsbad, Calif.-based biotechnology company with 9,500 employees. Stakeholder identification is an iterative process. Throughout change planning and implementation, change agents check and recheck for missing stakeholders.
Stakeholders are sorted based on their power to block the change and their interest in the change. Obviously, the change team needs to work with stakeholders who have high levels of power and interest. The need to consider powerful but disinterested stakeholders and interested but relatively powerless stakeholders may not be so obvious. The former group may become barriers to change attempts if they suddenly take an interest in the change. The latter group may be motivated to form coalitions or partner with more powerful stakeholders to gain voices in the change. In both instances, change implementation can be helped by consistent and early considerations of their potential interests.
Align Arguments to Build Momentum
A strong implementation plan builds momentum for the change among key stakeholder groups.
Justifications for the change can be linked to strongly held stakeholder values. If done carefully, this process can create a sense of ownership and connection among stakeholder groups. Essentially, the change process can create an opportunity to strengthen bonds between the key stakeholder groups by linking their underlying values.
"Individual stakeholders can be barriers to change but a group of aligned stakeholders can make all the difference when implementing a plan," says Renee Bradford, senior vice president for human resources at Hospice Compassus in Brentwood, Tenn.
"Stakeholders don’t come to the table all on the same page. It is important to create an environment where stakeholders can share their own and listen to others’ points of view. Be sure to build in time to have this open dialogue and to help the stakeholders focus on the central issues. Anything less than this will greatly reduce the opportunity to strengthen bonds between the stakeholders and thereby build momentum in support of the change project."
Create an Engagement Strategy
Once stakeholders’ interests and links to the change initiative have been identified, the change leader can chart an engagement strategy. The engagement strategy outlines the timing, order and actions for connecting with key stakeholders.
Which stakeholders need to be approached before the change becomes public? Do some need to hear about the change from you before they hear about it from another source? Do you want to invite certain people or groups to become partners in the change? Are there groups you want to avoid until the change gets to a certain point?
Address these questions in the engagement strategy. This step connects the stakeholder analysis with specific engagement actions and forces the change leader to consider how stakeholders influence each other.
Identify Trigger Events
Sometimes, trigger events must happen for the change to be successful but are outside the change leader’s control. Trigger events can include competitor actions, changes in regulation, changes in leadership, support from powerful stakeholders or other environmental shifts.
The team must recognize events they do not control as soon as possible. The sooner the team can recognize the limits of its influence, the sooner the team can devote its time to actions within its control. Recognizing trigger events enables the change leader to assess the probability of the change’s success based on the probability the trigger event will occur and begin making plans for rapid action once the trigger event occurs.
Plan to Be Wrong
During change implementation, count on one outcome: Something will go wrong, or at least not as expected. Successful implementation involves anticipating the unexpected and being ready to rapidly design a plan B, or a plan C. Environmental monitoring can be built into the change-implementation process so the change leader can identify weak signals indicating unanticipated reactions to the change.
The complexity of change management often comes back to the myriad stakeholder interests and their reactions and interactions throughout a change. By bringing these external perspectives into your change-planning process you greatly improve your chances for a successful outcome. As Sabo recommends: "Recognize that you need to give people time to process their reactions and build that into the change process."
The author is senior consultant with Decision Strategies International, a management and executive education consultant in Conshohocken, Pa.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies