Don't get left in the dark. Eclipse Special: Save $20 on professional membership with code ECLPS17
HR professionals share their advice for minimizing worker stress and boosting retention.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Virtual SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP Certification Prep Seminars kick off September 12 and fill up fast!
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
LAS VEGAS—The Department of Labor’s (DOL’s) long-anticipated overtime
proposed rule might come out this week, Tammy McCutchen, an attorney at
Littler in Washington, D.C., said in a June 29, 2015, concurrent
session at the Society for Human Resource Management 2015 Annual
Conference & Exposition.
She checks the Federal Register
preview site each day to see if the proposed rule is about to be
issued. If not soon, it could happen at least by the end of July, she
In the meantime, McCutchen, who was administrator of the DOL’s Wage
and Hour Division the last time the overtime regulations were revised in
2004, shared what she is hearing about the proposed rule. And some of
what she’s hearing is alarming.
McCutchen noted that everyone agrees it’s time to raise the salary
level since it hasn’t been raised in 11 years; the question is by how
The Economic Policy Institute has projected that the weekly salary
threshold for exempt status will be increased from $455 for all
exemptions to $984 a week. McCutchen asked session attendees how many
had a manager making less than $52,000 annually, and virtually every
hand went up.
She noted that if the salary level is raised that high, it would be
higher than California’s, which is $600 a week, and New York’s, which is
$800 a week.
Some are calling for even higher salary levels; she’s heard one
former DOL official say it should be as high as $69,000 annually.
McCutchen said $35,000 to $45,000 would be “a lot more reasonable.”
There also are proposals to have an annual automatic increase for
inflation of the salary level. If that idea reaches the final rule
stage, employers would have to reclassify every year, McCutchen
observed. She expects the DOL to include this idea in the proposed rule,
requiring HR professionals to inform the department why it’s a bad
The DOL is likely to adopt California’s rule on the primary duty
test, she noted. California requires that an employee spend more than 50
percent of the time on exempt duties in order to be classified as
Under federal law, a hard percentage has never been applied. That’s likely to change, McCutchen said.
Exempt employees will have to do exempt work more than 50 percent of
the time under the proposed rule, she predicted, and that will raise
administrative questions. Would an employer have to conduct expensive
time studies, for example, or follow employees around to see what they
“If this is in the final rule, your jobs just got a lot harder,”
McCutchen told attendees. She noted that in California, some employers
have given up on applying this test and classified everyone as
Under the executive exemption, an employee must supervise at least
two full-time employees. But that begs the question: What is full time?
The proposed rule may define full time as 40 compensable work hours,
McCutchen said. So what if someone is on Family and Medical Leave Act
leave? Or what if someone has quit or is away on vacation?
As a practical matter, this change may mean that employers will want
to treat employees as fitting within the executive exemption only when
they supervise at least three employees, she remarked.
McCutchen said the industries hit hardest by the proposed rule would
be restaurant and retail. She noted that $35,000 is a common salary for
assistant managers and that making them eligible for overtime has been
one of the main goals of the rulemaking.
Hospitality and other industries that have front-line managers who
sometimes step in and do the same work as the people they supervise also
are likely to be hit hard by the rule, she predicted. Employers with
employees below the new salary threshold will be vulnerable, McCutchen
added. After all, the stated purpose of the proposed rule was to make
“millions more eligible for overtime pay,” she observed.
While McCutchen is watching for the proposed rule to come out any day
now, she said the final rule likely will come out in summer or fall of
2016. At that time, employers will have to have their employees
reclassified. She doesn’t expect the final rule to have many changes
from the proposed rule.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
HR Education in a City Near You
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]