Not yet a Member?
HR Magazine is highlighting the next generation of HR leaders.
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
Join us in Chicago for the latest trends and technology in talent management, and what to expect in the future.
Four years after an initial report on employee engagement, North American organizations still struggle to create a workforce of engaged employees—workers who contribute to the organization’s success and take personal satisfaction in the role they play, according to a new report from BlessingWhite.
Not much has changed since the 2003 report, when the company found that a majority of employees liked their work and planned to stay with their employer but were not especially focused on what mattered most to their employers.
The good news for 2008, though, is North American employees are among the most engaged globally, just behind India, according to The State of Employee Engagement 2008.
Also, HR and sales departments have the most engaged employees (36 percent each); HR consulting/training was the industry with the largest proportion of engaged workers (46 percent), according to the report.
The bad news: More than 50 percent of senior executives have “less than ideal emotional connection and alignment” to their organization, BlessingWhite found.
Employee engagement has financial consequences, according to Stephen Parker, who presented BlessingWhite’s findings during an April 15, 2008, presentation in Washington, D.C.
He pointed to a growing body of research showing a link between high employee engagement and superior business performance.
Towers Perrin, for example, found that high-engagement organizations have a 28 percent earnings-per-share (EPS) growth rate; low-engagement organizations have shown an 11.2 percent EPS decline, Parker said. A report from the Society for Human Resource Managementfound that strengthening employee engagement saved one company $1.7 million in one year.
BlessingWhite’s 2008 report was based on findings from 7,508 respondents—49 percent of whom were supervisors or above—from a cross-section of job titles, functions and industries in North America, Europe, India, China and Australia/Southeast Asia that were followed by 40 backup interviews with HR and line leaders.
Parker’s presentation focused on the North American results; the bulk of respondents (44 percent) live in North America.
Levels of Engagement
BlessingWhite categorized engagement into the following five levels, although Parker noted that where a person falls “is very fluid, even on a daily basis”:
Engagement levels for supervisors, managers and directors are “just a step ahead of the core workforce,” according to the 2008 report.
“The situation seems to be strikingly better at the top, where 47 percent of vice presidents or above are engaged. Yet that leaves more than 50 percent of senior executives—the people counted on for shaping savvy business strategies and inspiring the workforce—with less than ideal emotional connection and alignment,” the report noted.
Industries with the largest numbers of engaged workers: HR consulting/training, followed by energy/utilities (40 percent), legal and business services (34 percent) and associations/not-for-profit (34 percent).
Respondents want more resources, greater clarity about what the organization needs from them and why, and regular specific feedback on what they are doing, Parker said.
Other steps employers can take to increase engagement, he said, are:
Redefine what ‘career’ means at your organization; 57 percent of North American employees don’t know what they want to do next. Make development a priority and re-think how you communicate promotions.
“It’s hard to have high engagement in a culture that doesn’t reinforce it,” Parker pointed out. Consider whether there can be candid discussions with employees about the five engagement levels and where they think they fall.
The key, he said, is one-on-one manager-employee relationships.
Kathy Gurchiek is associate editor for HR News. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies