New Member Promotion >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Giving applicants with criminal backgrounds a fair chance at employment can be good for business.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Apply for the SHRM Certification Exam and begin advancing your career.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
Most U.S. workers are frustrated by a lack of
honesty in their workplaces, a situation that could be remedied with
more-frequent—even weekly—monitoring of employee engagement, according to a new survey.
“Trust leads to higher productivity and
performance,” said David Hassell, CEO of 15Five, which conducted the online
survey of 1,023 full-time employees randomly selected by a third-party
pollster. “Lack of trust leads to a lot of maneuvering to try to protect one’s
The results of the Feb. 23-27, 2015, survey
were released March 16, 2015, by 15Five, which provides Web–based software to
help managers and employees communicate.
Employees were asked about their companies’
internal communication, and the results indicate that many companies “are
dealing with serious breakdowns,” 15Five wrote in a graphic highlighting the
Only 15 percent of employees said their
companies are doing a “very good” job fostering communication. More than 1 in 8
said they’d rather join a company that values open communication than one that
offers lavish perks like top health plans, free food and gym memberships.
In fact, the vast majority of employees said
that having managers personally check in with them for at least five minutes a
week is more important than such benefits.
A lack of communication can lead employees to
believe that supervisors are being secretive, and it can also convince them, in
turn, that being open with their managers invites repercussions.
“There are two ways to look at lack of
honesty,” Hassell said. “There’s blatantly saying one thing when there’s really
another thing going on. Then there’s a lack of open sharing. Leaders may just
share positive things but not necessarily anything about challenges—often
because leaders fear they may lose the faith of employees. Employees may fear
that if they share what’s really going on with them, they may lose their jobs.
Usually the exact opposite happens: By sharing openly with staff, you engender
Tossing the Annual Performance Review
Lisa H. Shuster, chief administrative officer
for Frederick, Md.-based iHire LLC, eliminated annual performance reviews for
her 50 employees after concluding that workers hated completing them, managers
hated reviewing them and the reviews weren’t conducive to continual feedback for
Instead, managers now hold biweekly meetings
with workers to discuss progress toward objectives, how supervisors can support
employees’ development, training opportunities and how to overcome any
obstacles to the workers’ goals. For bonus and compensation purposes, employees
are still evaluated, with “A” performers—defined as consistently meeting or
exceeding goals—earning at least 75 percent of the market-based compensation
for the industry, and sometimes more, as well as a cost-of-living salary
“A lot of the bureaucracy that you have with
annual performance evaluations is gone,” said Shuster, whose company helps
businesses find employees and vice versa. “If the employee does an evaluation,
then the manager reads it and writes her own evaluation, then it goes to HR,
then back to the manager—that’s a very bureaucratic process. Managers need to
be having regular communications and relationships with their employees. The
annual performance evaluation was never intended to be a substitute for having
those regular discussions.”
Luke Frye, accounting operations manager with
Bench Accounting Inc., discovered that annual performance evaluations could not
keep pace with his company’s rapid growth. “Within that amount of time, the
company structure and processes are completely different and perhaps
irrelevant,” said Frye, whose company pairs business owners with a bookkeeping
team and Web-based software to complete monthly financials.
So now Frye reviews all his direct reports
every week, then has a half-hour, Monday check-in with each that focuses, he
said, on “What are you working on this week, and how can I help?”
“Providing clear feedback every week enables
everyone to collaborate and be part of innovative ideas on how to work together
better and faster.”
Baby Boomers and Millennials tend to be
critical of each other’s communication styles, with the former complaining that
Millennials “tend to rely exclusively on e-mail and text, and rarely, if ever,
pick up the phone to discuss an issue or solve a problem,” 15Five wrote in the
graphic. Millennials tend to say that their Boomer supervisors don’t
“understand social media and how people communicate today.”
“There’s an impression from the younger generations that Boomers are being
guarded,” Hassell said, adding that this may contribute to the feeling among
employees—at least younger ones—that their bosses aren’t being open and
transparent. “The conversation is more of a one-directional communication,
where expectations are set, directives are given, but there’s not feedback,
[and the Millennials] feel they don’t have a voice. A lot of these folks are on
the front lines of the company, dealing with the customer and the product, and
they have a sense for what’s going on—more so than someone who’s two steps
removed. But many organizations don’t tap into that and elicit feedback on how
the company can improve.”
Forty percent of employees reported that
they’re able to share ideas for improving their job performance just a few
times a year or less.
Hassell asks each of his employees to spend 15
minutes a week writing a report about work projects and obstacles they may have
encountered that takes him about five minutes to read. He does that reading in
about a half-hour on Sunday nights, reviewing this feedback from his six direct
reports so he can have insight into what’s going on in their work world, which
can lead to more conversations when everyone returns to work Monday.
“It creates a regular rhythm of
communication,” Hassell said. “It’s a way to get communication flowing so that
when you do have face time, you’re already briefed, you already understand the
issues and you already have a deep connection.”
Dana Wilkie is an online editor/manager for
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
HR Education in a City Near You
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies