We're celebrating 10 Days of Membership! Today's Gift: $20 off your professional membership with promo 10DAYS20OFF
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Develop your HR competencies and knowledge in-person in 12 U.S. cities or virtually.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Virginia Supreme Court Case Challenges At-Will Employment
On Jan. 11, SHRM and the SHRM Virginia State Council (VASHRM) filed an amicus briefin the Virginia Supreme Court case Johnston v. William E. Wood & Associates Inc. In this case, Brenda Johnston, whose employment was terminated by William E. Wood & Associates in 2013, argues that her termination was unlawful because she was not provided “reasonable notice” in advance of her termination.
Virginia, along with every state in the country but Montana, operates under the doctrine of “at-will” employment, meaning that any employer can terminate an employee at any time and for any reason, except an illegal one, without incurring legal liability. Similarly, employees are free to quit at any time. Some states have developed limited exceptions to the at-will doctrine either by statute or interpretation of common law.
In the amicus brief, SHRM and VASHRM (joined by the Virginia Chamber of Commerce, the Virginia Assisted Living Association, the Virginia Retail Merchants Association, and the Virginia Restaurant Lodging and Travel Association) argue that Virginia law and practice in this area does not support the requirement of advance notice for either employers or employees who seek to end an employment relationship. If advance notice is required to fire an at-will employee, every case involving a termination will result in a jury question of whether the notice provided was reasonable. In addition, the brief argues that any change to the at-will doctrine should be made by the legislature after full consideration of the social, economic and policy implications.
The Johnston case is one to watch, not only for its impact on at-will employment in Virginia but also for the repercussions it could have in other at-will employment across the country. SHRM will keep you apprised of developments in this case.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies