Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Congress Introduces Measures to Block NLRB "Ambush" Rule
Earlier this week, the Senate and House chairs of the respective workplace committees in Congress, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Congressman John Kline (R-MN) introduced
resolutions of disapproval which, if enacted, could nullify the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s) representation election rule, also known as the “ambush” election rule.
SHRM strongly supports the resolutions and has sent letters to both the
House highlighting concerns on behalf of the HR profession. The ambush election rule gets its nickname because of its focus on speeding up the union election process at the expense of both employees and employers, who will have insufficient time to understand and address the relevant issues about the consequences of unionization in the workplace. SHRM has long supported the fundamental right, guaranteed by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), of every employee to make an informed, private choice about whether or not to join a union. While estimates vary, under this rule elections could occur in as little as 7 to 11 days after the employer is notified of an election petition.
A vote on the resolution of disapproval is expected in each chamber in the coming months. If Congress is able to pass the resolution, it will likely be subject to a veto by President Barack Obama. Thus, both chambers of Congress will need to generate a two-thirds majority vote in order to override a certain veto by the president.
As reported earlier, SHRM has also filed
a lawsuit challenging the NLRB ambush election rulemaking–notable in that it is only the third time SHRM has challenged a federal rule in court. On February 5, 2015, SHRM filed a motion for summary judgment asking that the court vacate and set aside the rule. We anticipate that the NLRB will oppose our motion and we have asked the court to hold oral argument on the case. To read the full text of the complaint and motion for summary judgment, click
If you want to get the latest on the NLRB ambush election rule, be sure to register for the
2015 SHRM Employment Law and Legislative Conference
HERE, which will feature exclusive panels with two newly appointed members of the NLRB. To learn more about the panels, click
2015 Shaping Up to Be an Active Year on the Legislative Front
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies