Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018.
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 14 cities across the U.S. this fall.
Gain the skills you need to rise to the next level in your career. Jon us at SHRM's Leadership Development Forum, October 2-3 in Boston.
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Last week, the House Education and the Workforce Committee approved H.R. 3459, the Protecting Local Business Opportunity
Act, legislation strongly supported by SHRM. The bill passed the committee by a party-line vote of 21 to 15. The legislation, if signed into law, would overturn the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB’s) Browning-Ferris Industries decision, which fundamentally altered the existing joint employer standard.
As a recap, in rendering its opinion in the case this past August, the NLRB found that “indirect control” or even “unexercised potential” to control working conditions now makes two separate employers joint employers. This decision disrupts a well-recognized, 30-year standard by employers and employees. The previous joint employer standard required an employer to have “actual, direct, and immediate” control over an employee to be considered a joint employer. SHRM, which filed an amicus brief with the NLRB prior to ruling in the case, urged the NLRB to retain the existing definition of a joint employer. Now that the NLRB has ruled otherwise, enactment of H.R. 3459 into law would accomplish this goal.
SHRM expressed strong support for the legislation in a letter sent to Committee Chairman John Kline (R-MN) and Ranking Member Bobby Scott (D-VA). The legislation now has been referred to the full House of Representatives, and a similar bill is pending before the U.S. Senate. Congressional leaders may also look to the appropriations process to attempt to block or delay the implementation of the new NLRB joint employer standard.
Stay tuned for more updates on this important issue from SHRM.
Capitol Hill Update
Budget Agreement Includes Provisions Affecting Employer-Provided Benefits
SHRM-Supported Legislation to Restore “Joint Employer” Standard Moves in House
EEOC Issues Proposed Rule Detailing Wellness Plan Incentives Under GINA
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies