Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
Karin Hurt discusses workplace diversity, single motherhood and why being who you are at work matters.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Bill would prohibit waiver of whistle-blowers’ protections
Employer “gag tactics” aimed at silencing whistle-blowers at financial institutions are becoming more common, according to Shanna Devine, legislative director of the Government Accountability Project in Washington, D.C., which supports a bill to prohibit the waiver of whistle-blower rights. The Government Accountability Project is a whistle-blower protection and advocacy organization in the United States.
“If we strengthen and empower whistle-blowers in the financial industry, we can do a better job of holding Wall Street accountable,” stated Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., sponsor of the bill, when it was introduced on Feb. 25.
However, the bill would afford an “extraordinary” broadening of whistle-blowing protections, according to Phil Berkowitz, an attorney with Littler in New York City.
Berkowitz said that the proposed legislation would prohibit employers from:
The bill goes beyond banning so-called gag provisions.
For the first time, employees of all banks, regardless of whether they are publicly traded, would be able to sue for damages as a result of being retaliated against as whistle-blowers and get double back pay and interest plus attorney fees, Berkowitz said. Currently, only employees of Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.-insured and publicly traded banks can sue as whistle-blowers, he noted.
The bill would pay whistle-blowers up to 30 percent of any financial settlement, Greg Keating, an attorney with Choate, Hall & Stewart in Boston, said. That is similar to a bounty already available to those covered by the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act). The Dodd-Frank Act created a bounty program within the SEC to encourage people to report securities violations.
“It also expands how much time whistle-blowers have to file their information from 60 to 90 days,” Keating added.
“This bill should send a strong message to employers that now is the time to take action and ensure that they are fully committed to a culture of compliance and transparency,” he said.
In fact, the bill would require the education and training of employees on their rights and remedies under the law, Berkowitz remarked.
Devine told SHRM Online that the bill also would:
Devine said the bill “sends the message to employers that Congress is keeping pace with increasing tactics to silence whistle-blowers.”
However, Berkowitz said it would be “amazing if the bill gets passed. I don’t know if Congress passes anything these days.” The bill would need bipartisan support to clear the Republican-controlled House and Senate, and as of yet does not have any Republican co-sponsors.
Allen Smith, J.D., is the manager of workplace law content for SHRM. Follow him @SHRMlegaleditor.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Apply by March 23
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies