This Month Only! >> $20 off and a FREE SHRM tote with your membership and code TOTE2018!
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Publicly owned, for-profit entities and companies that employ 25,000 employees or more are most likely to engage in effective practices for accommodating people with disabilities, according to a study by the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) in collaboration with the Cornell University ILR School Employment and Disability Institute.
However, a majority of employers from all sectors, industries and sizes engage in the following accommodation practices:
The report released May 18, 2012, is the second in a series of three studies focused on people with disabilities. It was fielded Oct. 19-Dec. 15, 2011, and includes responses from 662 HR professionals, selected randomly from SHRM’s membership. Sixty percent of respondents worked for organizations with U.S.-based operations only; the rest of the respondents worked for companies with multinational operations.
Effective Practices for Accessibility, Accommodations
In addition to identifying practices their organizations use, respondents were asked to rate the effectiveness of each practice. The most effective practices, according to those who use them, are:
Yet regardless of perceived effectiveness, just 20 percent of organizations have a centralized accommodation fund, and less than half (47 percent) have a formal decision-making process.
first report in the series, which focused on recruiting and hiring individuals with disabilities, found that 61 percent of organizations include disability as a key element in their diversity strategies. Yet the latest research finds that few organizations (30 percent) take steps to ensure that those with visual, hearing, finger dexterity and cognitive impairments can access their organization’s online application system.
Moreover, of those that do conduct a regular accessibility evaluation, more than a quarter (28 percent) did not know if the practice is effective.
Respondents were similarly unsure as to whether providing advance notification to applicants of the availability of accommodations is helpful.
Impact of Organization Type and Size
In most cases, publicly owned, for-profit companies were somewhat more likely than privately owned for-profit companies to engage in the accommodation practices covered by the research. For example, 78 percent of publicly owned firms said that they evaluate their pre-employment occupational screenings to ensure that they are unbiased, compared to 58 percent of privately owned companies. And 65 percent of publicly owned companies have a formal decision-making process for accommodations, compared to just 38 percent of privately owned companies. Increased accountability to shareholders is one motivation to implement effective practices.
In addition, companies with 25,000 employees or more are, perhaps not surprisingly, far more likely than employers with less than 100 employees to engage in certain accommodation and accessibility practices.
For example, of the three most effective practices noted above, the largest organizations were far more likely than the smallest organizations to maintain a centralized accommodation fund (59 percent vs. 9 percent). Similarly, the largest organizations are more likely than the smallest organizations to use a formal decision-making process for accommodations (74 percent vs. 38 percent).
Yet organization size doesn’t matter for every accommodation and accessibility practice. The SHRM/Cornell study found no statistical difference between large and small organizations with regard to several other practices examined.
The research was funded by a grant from the U.S. Department of Education’s National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
Related information can be found on
SHRM’s Disability Employment Resource Page.
Rebecca R. Hastings, SPHR, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies