Not yet a Member?
HR Magazine is highlighting the next generation of HR leaders.
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
30+ HR education programs, including 4 NEW programs on hot topics, are available for registration.
Learn to implement the complex changes and ensure compliance with the FLSA. 2-Week Virtual Seminar, Nov 29-Dec 8.
Online dialogue examines barriers to students and professionals
Stereotypes, a lack of mentors and ignorance about the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are among the challenges that people with disabilities face on the job, according to comments posted during an online dialogue hosted by a federal office and an advocacy group.
The dialogue—Encouraging People with Disabilities to Pursue Careers in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics)—ran from July 28 to Aug. 8, 2014, to get insights and ideas on how to boost opportunities for people with disabilities who want to pursue careers in STEM fields. It was hosted by the Office of Disability Employment Policy (ODEP) and the National Council on Disability (NCD).
According to a
report from the U.S. Department of Commerce, STEM jobs grew at a rate that was triple that of non-STEM jobs between 2000 and 2010. And the number of STEM jobs in the nation is projected to increase 20 percent by 2018, the report found. Finally, STEM workers command higher wages, earning about 26 percent more than their non-STEM counterparts, the study reported.
“Unfortunately, however, individuals with disabilities often face challenges to pursuing careers and degrees in STEM and are underrepresented in the STEM fields,” ODEP and NCD wrote on the website advertising the online dialogue.
Alice Wong, a council member with the NCD who moderated the dialogue, said the forum allowed ODEP and her organization “to engage in conversations with people with disabilities and other stakeholders on … ways to encourage people with disabilities in STEM careers. In addition to traditional town halls, in-person meetings, webinars and teleconferences, online dialogues are another way advocates can reach a broader audience and crowd-source substantive ideas and solutions."
Employers Need Educating
Some who posted comments indicated that interviewers need training to counter biases they may have about people with disabilities. One person wrote about a student who encountered several interviewers who “saw him in person [and] assumed that he could not perform certain physical tasks”—even though a disability advocacy group had certified the student’s competency for the job for which he was applying.
Another noted that students often encounter interviewers who are unfamiliar with ADA requirements or who are unaware that the act requires employers to provide adaptive equipment for workers with disabilities.
“Many employers are unaware of this, do not have the paperwork, or are unwilling to provide the assistive technology,” the person wrote. “Most [interviewers] have good hearts, and want to help, but don't know how, and ADA education for employers would be a good thing.”
Lacking: Sign Language Proficiency, Mentors
A third person wrote that sign-language interpreters often don’t know how to sign the difficult and technical terms that crop up in STEM courses.
“How can a [hearing impaired] student pass a course when the interpreter did not communicate it all?” the person asked. “All too often, the interpreter just doesn't understand enough STEM to proficiently interpret the event. Interpreters need more training in subject matter.”
A fourth person complained that graduate students are often hindered in their STEM studies and future STEM careers because they lack mentors with disabilities.
“Academic departments [and] career and disability service offices could connect students with disabilities with alumni, internships and companies in STEM fields,” another person wrote. “It would make the process of internship and career planning a lot less intimidating if the student could be assured that they will be supported as aspiring professionals and not have to worry about discrimination based on disability.”
Among the suggestions that the dialogue participants offered were:
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies