We're celebrating 10 Days of Membership! Today's Gift: $20 off your professional membership with promo 10DAYS20OFF
Training, policies and tools to help HR prevent and respond to harassment claims.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Develop your HR competencies and knowledge in-person in 12 U.S. cities or virtually.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
A coalition of international labor groups that claims that multinational corporations collude with some governments to suppress workers’ attempts to organize is urging passage of a pro-union U.S. law as the first step toward re-energizing labor movements around the world.
More than half of U.S. workers would like to join a union, but companies are thwarting workers’ freedom to form unions and U.S. labor laws are helpless to stop them, said John Sweeney, president of the AFL-CIO, which is a member of the Council of Global Unions, at a news conference Dec. 12, 2007, in Washington, D.C. The United States is exporting a “lawless corporate culture” globally and thereby “creating a domino effect that’s toppling workers’ rights worldwide,” said Sweeney at the press briefing. The event was part of a conference on global workers’ rights designed to garner support for the proposed Employee Free Choice Act (H.R. 800, S. 1041). The briefing highlighted the council-sponsored report, Unions Facing Hard Times: The Global Crisis in Union Collective Bargaining.
The Employee Free Choice Act was introduced in the Senate by Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass., who spoke at the news conference but took no questions. “This era of globalization must be judged not just by growing profit margins and rising GDPs [gross domestic products], but by how we treat the workers who make the progress possible,” he said. “We know that true progress and prosperity for our nations come only when our workers share in economic growth. In the United States, we’ve seen this first-hand, as strong unions made a strong economy, but in far too many instances across the planet, workers rights’ and economic security are under attack,” he said.
“It is time to stop this global assault on labor rights and put the brakes on a global economy that creates a boon for business and a bust for labor,” Kennedy said. “It’s time to put an end to the harassment and violence that trade unionists face around the world. But workers can’t do it alone; they need legal assistance that upholds workplace rights instead of trampling them down.” The House approved the Employee Free Choice Act—introduced there by Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., on March 1, 2007. The Senate version, which has 46 co-sponsors, was referred to the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which Kennedy chairs.
The bill seeks to amend the National Labor Relations Act to make it easier for workers “to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to provide for mandatory injunctions for unfair labor practices during organizing efforts.” Specific measures in the bill that might make it easier for workers to form or join unions are:
However, the Employee Free Choice Act would not solve all of the problems facing American unions and workers, John Logan, a lecturer with the London School of Economics and Political Science who wrote the report, told SHRM Online.
The number of employees who want to form unions and negotiate collective bargaining agreements is far greater in the United States than in any other developed country, yet U.S. union membership is only about 12 percent, the lowest of all the industrialized countries, Logan said. The country with the second-lowest percentage of employees who are represented by unions is Japan with 24 percent, and the highest is France with 95 percent, he said. The report says U.S. union membership is impeded by weak laws that do not provide enough protection for the right to form unions and engage in collective bargaining, he said. In addition, U.S. employer opposition is much more entrenched, and companies are much more aggressive in their opposition to unions in the U.S. than in any other advanced English-speaking country, and probably greater than in any other country in the developed world, he said. Highlights of the report are:
J.J. Smith is manager of SHRM Online’s Global HR Focus Area.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies