New Professional Member Special>>> Save $15 and receive a SHRM tote bag
HR professionals can play a key role in creating business efficiency—starting with their own department.
Save $15 on a Professional Membership and Receive a FREE Tote Bag.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
We don't just visit a city, we take it over. Join us in NOLA -- June 18 - 21, 2017.
In June 2010, the U.S. Department of Labor's Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) issued a
final rule clarifying certain issues relating to the timing and order of domestic relations orders under section 206(d)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).
According to a summary published in the
Federal Register, the rule provides guidance to plan administrators, service providers, participants, and alternate payees on the qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) requirements under ERISA. The rule is being issued in response to a specific statutory directive contained in the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA).
In essence, the rule clarifies that a plan administrator cannot disqualify a domestic relations order (DRO) that otherwise meets ERISA’s QDRO standards solely because the order is issued after, or revises, another domestic relations order or QDRO. Similarly, a DRO that otherwise meets ERISA’s requirements to be a QDRO will not be disqualified because of the time at which it is issued, such as after the parties divorce, or after the death of the participant.
Moreover, the rule stipulates that these DROs are subject to the same requirements and protections that apply to all QDROs under section 206(d)(3) of ERISA.
EBSA issued an
interim final rule in March 2007 involving the timing of a domestic relations order with regards to the Pension Protection Act.
Ilyse Schuman, a former top congressional staffer and policy advisor, is part of law firm
Littler Mendelson's government affairs practice. She provides clients with strategic counsel and substantive knowledge on legislative and regulatory developments impacting employers.
Reposted with permission
Editor’s Note: This article should not be construed as legal advice.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies