April is Stress Awareness Month. Let SHRM make your work life easier: Join Now
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Employers need an objective basis for believing an employee is abusing FMLA leave
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
The federal district court in Idaho was troubled that surveilling an employee—in this case, John Walker, a longtime police officer with the Pocatello police department—without any basis might "chill" an employee from taking Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) leave. The court said in its Jan. 31, 2018 ruling:
Walker contends that the Police Department engaged in actions which had the effect of deterring the exercise of FMLA rights. Specifically, when defendants had doubt about the validity of Walker's medical condition, they did not simply request another medical opinion as contemplated by the regulations. Instead, they tracked Walker, and surveilled his activities on his own property by setting up a police surveillance camera on his neighbor's fields. . . . There is a genuine issue as to whether the Police Department's invasive surveillance of Walker's private activities would "chill" his use of FMLA, and whether they were negative consequences of Walker taking FMLA leave. (Walker v. City of Pocatello)
Often enough, employers ask whether they have the right to conduct surveillance on an employee they suspect is abusing FMLA leave. Courts generally support an employer's right to do so where there is a clear concern that the employee is abusing FMLA leave, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit
held in a 2012 ruling.
Put Policies in Place
Where FMLA abuse is particularly rampant, the use of surveillance can be effective to ensure employees are being honest with their use of leave. Before heading down this path, however, it is critical that surveillance is consistent with your personnel policies (courts typically want to know that employees have been on notice of the possibility of surveillance) and any applicable collective bargaining agreements (CBA). Where a CBA is involved, surveillance also may need to be bargained with the union.
Also, maintain a policy regarding the fraudulent use of FMLA leave. Not currently in your policy? Have your employment attorney update your policy now, as this type of provision is a gem to hang your hat on when you have to defend an FMLA claim involving a (former) employee suspected of misusing FMLA leave.
Are Second Opinions Necessary?
Must the employer seek a second opinion before surveilling an employee? Not necessarily, and I think in
Walker the court overstepped by insisting that the police department should have done so here. Before pulling the trigger on surveillance, however, it is critical that the employer have an objective basis for believing that an employee is abusing a leave of absence, for instance:
Have an Objective Basis for Seeking Surveillance
In Walker's situation, it appears as though the police department fell woefully short of establishing an objective basis for seeking surveillance. Because there was no honest belief that Walker was misusing his FMLA leave, there was no objective basis for conducting surveillance. Consequently, a court—and therefore, a jury—is left to believe that the surveillance (and the notes to file) are attempts to chill an employee's use of FMLA leave. As this particular court points out, that may very well be an FMLA violation.
Jeff Nowak is a Chicago-based partner and co-chair of the labor and employment practice at
Franczek Radelet P.C. and author of the
FMLA Insights blog, where a longer version of this article originally appeared. © 2018 Franczek Radelet P.C. All rights reserved. Republished with permission.
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more.
Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies