New to HR? Templates, tools and development to make you a seasoned pro in no time.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Measure would allow use of HSA dollars to pay health premiums
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
For the first time, people could use their health savings accounts (HSAs) to pay for health care premiums for individual-market plans with pretax dollars, under a revised version of the Better Care Reconciliation Act, the Senate GOP leadership's bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
While the change would not seem to directly affect active employees with coverage through their workplace, it could encourage employees to build up HSA funds during their working years to pay premiums for post-employment health coverage—including Medicare-supplement health policies. That, in turn, could make HSAs a more attractive employee benefit, and encourage more employees to select a high-deductible health plan option that can be coupled with an HSA.
One revision could affect executives and other high-earning employees—and could be a factor in structuring compensation packages: The bill retains the ACA's 3.8 percent tax on net investment income for certain high-income taxpayers and the ACA's additional 0.9 percent Medicare payroll surtax on earned income on wages above $200,000 (individuals), $250,000 (joint filers), and $125,000 (spouses filing separately).
An Attempt to Win Over GOP Skeptics
The revised Senate bill is broadly similar to the earlier measure that Senate GOP leaders hoped to vote on before the Fourth of July recess, though the new version includes some additional provisions meant to entice reluctant Republican senators with varying policy concerns. The new draft bill, for instance, would not include any changes from current law to the net investment income tax or the additional Medicare payroll tax paid by certain high-income people. The bill would allow people to use HSAs to pay insurance premiums, a policy change that Republicans said would increase health care coverage. (New York Times)
An Appeal to Conservatives and Moderates
The bill made these changes to appease moderates:
And these changes to appease conservatives:
More Changes Ahead
Senators are already angling for more changes. An amendment from Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., would direct much of the ACA's federal funding directly to the states. Several moderates, however, are worried that the bill would hurt people with pre-existing conditions. A number of Republicans also are uncomfortable with spending reductions to Medicaid. (Politico)
How ACA Employer Provisions Differ from the Republican Health Care Bills
A chart detailing how provisions relating to employer-sponsored group health plans and health-related employee benefits differ under the ACA, the House bill to repeal and replace the ACA (known as the American Health Plan Act) and the Senate bill. (SHRM Online)
[SHRM members-only toolkit: Communicating with Employees About Health Care Benefits Under the Affordable Care Act]
Even Without the Mandates, Workplace Health Benefits Are Here to Stay
Both the House and Senate GOP ACA-repeal bills would effectively end enforcement of the ACA's individual and employer mandates around health care. Even absent enforcement of these mandates, it's expected that few employees would opt out of paying for employer-sponsored coverage, and few employers would choose to stop providing group health coverage to their workers. But it's is likely that some employers would pare back employee eligibility to enroll in their plans. (SHRM Online)
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Talent Attraction Study: What Matters to the Modern Candidate
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies