Finally get that promotion? Get exclusive content, tips and tools to help you excel.
Implicit bias occurs when individuals make judgments about people based on gender, race or other prohibited factors without even realizing they’re doing it.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
NYC employers subject to the ordinance should take steps to ensure compliance
A New York City ordinance requiring most employers to provide qualified pretax transportation benefits to their employees becomes effective on Jan. 1, 2016.
While many employers already provide pretax transportation benefits as a matter of company policy (see IRS Publication 15-B – Qualified Transportation Benefits for an explanation of the federal tax treatment of such benefits), effective Jan. 1, 2016, unless otherwise exempted, New York City employers with at least 20 full-time employees in the city of New York must offer full-time employees the opportunity to purchase pretax qualified transportation fringe benefits.
For purposes of the legislation, a full-time employee is any employee who works an average of 30 hours or more per week for an employer.
The ordinance does not apply:
1. To federal, state or local governmental agencies/employers;
2. Where a collective bargaining agreement exists between an employer and employees, except where the number of full-time employees not covered by any such agreement is at least 20, in which case those full-time employees not covered by the agreement would be eligible for the pretax transportation benefits; or
3. Where the employer is not required by law to pay federal, state or city payroll taxes.
The Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA), the same agency tasked with enforcement of the New York City Earned Sick Time ordinance, will have responsibility for enforcing the transportation benefits ordinance.
In addition to the exemptions noted above, the DCA also has authority to waive the requirements of the ordinance if an employer demonstrates to the DCA’s satisfaction that offering the benefits would cause a financial hardship for the employer.
The following proposed rules have been issued by the Commissioner of the DCA clarifying certain provision of the ordinance:
•Establish a minimum time an employee must be employed by an employer before qualifying for transportation benefits. Jan. 1, 2014, or after four weeks of full-time employment, whichever is later.
•Exclude remote workers. Benefits would not need to be provided to full-time employees that work remotely and do not commute to a location or physical worksite in New York City.
•Impose certain recordkeeping requirements demonstrating compliance with the law. Maintain records for two years showing that eligible employees were offered benefits and whether they accepted or decline.
•Establish how business size is calculated to determine whether a business is covered under the law. Size would be based on the average number of full-time employees during the most recent three consecutive months.
•Clarify how the law applies to temporary help firms. The temporary help firm would be deemed the employer and required to comply with the ordinance.
Employers in violation of the ordinance can be held liable for civil penalties of $100 to $250 for the first violation and $250 for any subsequent violations. Employers will have 90 days to cure a first violation before a civil penalty is imposed. Further, if an employer fails to cure the violation, every 30 days after the cure period expires will be a subsequent violation.
All covered New York City employers must develop measures to ensure compliance with the transportation benefit ordinance.
In addition, as transportation benefit plans are not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), unlike many other employer-sponsored employee benefit plans, these plans are subject to a myriad of state and local requirements (e.g., wage withholding requirements and escheat or reversion rules).
Richard I. Greenberg, Daniel J. Jacobs and Melissa Ostrower are attorney shareholders in the New York office of Jackson Lewis. © 2015 Jackson Lewis P.C. All rights reserved. Reposted with permission.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
HR Education in a City Near You
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies