Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Make sure supervisors know these common justifications for harassment are unacceptable.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
Amid growing concerns over the high cost of retiree health benefits, many large U.S. employers are considering plan alternatives that better align with their current workforce planning initiatives. These findings stem from the
2015 Survey on Retiree Health Care Strategies conducted by Towers Watson.
The consultancy surveyed 144 HR executives at large and midsize U.S. employers that sponsor retiree medical benefits in September 2014. The surveyed companies represent 2.1 million employees and nearly 1 million retirees. Among the responses:
• 89 percent of HR executives said retirement health care benefit security is somewhat to extremely important to their retirees.
• 78 percent provide health benefits to both pre-Medicare and Medicare-eligible retirees.
• 70 percent will offer health care benefits to the majority of their current full-time employees upon retirement. But the number of employers offering retiree health care benefits to employees hired in 2014 or later drops to 57 percent.
“Employers that plan to continue offering medical benefits to retirees often do so because they want to fulfill their commitment,” said Trevis Parson, chief health actuary at Towers Watson, in a news release accompanying the survey findings. “Yet the combination of several external factors is significantly changing the landscape, and employers are evaluating new strategies to deliver on their promise.”
In addition to an overall concern about rising costs, the Affordable Care Act’s 2018
excise tax on high-cost health plans—including retiree health benefits—is another issue facing employers. A considerable percentage (39 percent) cited the tax as a major reason to evaluate retiree medical strategy over the next few years.
An additional factor is the lack of alignment between current retiree medical programs and workforce management goals:
• Only 38 percent of HR executives said their retiree medical benefit is effective in attracting and retaining workers.
• Just 26 percent said the benefit is integrated with broader workforce management and retirement strategies.
“Historically, employers have tried to reduce the cost and risk exposure of retiree medical benefits by changing plan design, capping subsidies, changing eligibility requirements, and limiting or ending the benefits for new hires,” said Julie Stone, a health and group benefits leader at Towers Watson. “However, many employers recognize that these traditional cost- and risk-control solutions have run their course and that other alternatives may better connect with business goals.”
Source: Towers Watson
Among existing options for Medicare-eligible retirees:
• 78 percent of employers are now using or considering using the services of a private Medicare exchange to assist retirees in selecting individual coverage.
• 41 percent are funding or considering funding retiree medical benefits through a voluntary employee beneficiary association or 401(h) to reduce their risk profile.
• 21 percent are converting their subsidy to a retiree medical savings account, with another 18 percent considering this by 2017.
Among new options for pre-Medicare retirees are public and private health insurance exchanges. The survey revealed that:
• While only 8 percent of employers are very confident about public exchanges for 2015, confidence rises to 35 percent by 2017.
• 52 percent will reassess their current approach to providing pre-Medicare retiree health care benefits and consider public health insurance exchanges by 2017.
• 31 percent are considering these changes for 2016.
Also, as employers assess the future risk of retiree medical liabilities, some are considering new strategies, similar to
approaches used to de-risk pensions, for transferring or settling the liability.
One strategy involves employers purchasing group annuities for retirees. The annuities transfer the financial responsibility and liability for employer-provided subsidies to a highly rated insurer, which guarantees lifetime funding of health care benefits for retirees.
“Predictions that employer-sponsored retiree health care will totally disappear are exaggerated. New alternatives allow employers to design an approach that meets overall business and workforce management objectives in terms of attracting talent and helping workers plan for retirement,” said Parson.
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM. Follow him on Twitter
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]