Support through your toughest HR challenges: A network of 285,000 HR professionals.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
Two-thirds of employers think that the U.S. Supreme Court will overturn the individual coverage mandate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which was signed into law March 2010, but that the court will keep other major pieces of reform intact. The
survey was conducted in May 2012 by the
International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans (IFEBP).
The remaining respondents are split: 19 percent predict that the court will keep the law intact, and 15 percent expect the court to throw out the entire law.
The Wisconsin-based nonprofit’s
findings were released June 5, 2012. Responses were received from 1,027 plan administrators, trustees and organizational representatives from single-employers, corporations, multiemployer trust funds and public/governmental employers.
The high court is expected to release its decision near the end of June 2012.
The case focuses primarily on the mandate that individuals purchase health care coverage and secondarily on a provision requiring states to provide expanded Medicaid benefits.
Among the court’s options: leave the law unchanged; strike it down entirely; and strike down portions of the law, such as the “no pre-existing condition” exclusion requirement, which is a provision linked to the individual coverage mandate, according to a May 2012
SHRM Online article.
Positive Financial Impact Foreseen
When asked which ruling would have the most positive financial impact on their organizations, respondents said:
However, provisions of the law that many respondents would like for the court to keep intact include:
IFEBP members are in a “wait and see” mode, according to the survey, with three in five organizations following the case extremely closely or very closely. Fewer than 2 percent are not monitoring the case. Those with fewer than 50 workers and those with more than 10,000 workers are paying the closest attention to the case, according to the IFEBP.
“While the [IFEBP] recognizes that reaching a consensus on the [reform law] among our membership would be difficult,” IFEBP CEO Michael Wilson said in a released statement, “it’s clear that our members agree that steps must be taken to address the access to quality, affordable health care in America.”
SHRM Online Health Care Reform Resource Page
Sign up for SHRM’s free
Compensation & Benefits e-newsletter
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Talent Attraction Study: What Matters to the Modern Candidate
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies