Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Don't leave the task of calculating total cost of workforce to the finance department.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
On average, participants in 401(k) or other defined contribution (DC) plans use less than five investment funds. However, the majority of plan sponsors have investment lineups offering three to five times that many options. While the intention is to help employees achieve adequate retirement income by providing diversification of asset classes, the result is often to leave participants feeling confused and overwhelmed, according to findings from the
Defined Contribution Trends 2014 survey by financial services firm SEIC.
As plan sponsors continue to look for ways to help employees save for a secure retirement, many are moving to simplify the structure of their investment lineups, according to the SEIC survey, completed in February by 285 executives at DC plans ranging in size from $25 million to more than $5 billion. The key findings were:
“Smaller plan lineups could help increase overall participation, deferral rates and overall equity allocations,” the report states. “More is not necessarily always better. Many DC plan sponsors are coming to this conclusion as they examine the current state of their investment options in their plan and consider consolidation.”
The report further notes, “Rarely does a high number of funds result in participants being in a position to succeed. Participants might attempt to diversify by using all of the options made available to them, resulting in less than optimized asset allocations. Or, participants might be overloaded with choices, thus electing status quo.”
Past industry research supports this point, indicating a decline of participation rates as the number of offered funds increases. Moreover, plan sponsors can, in many cases, offer fewer funds and effectively cover the full range of institutional asset classes. For example, the report suggests that a simplified lineup might include a best-in-class fund for the following asset classes:
An oversaturated plan lineup could make it more difficult for plan sponsors to meet oversight and due diligence requirements, the report observes. “The most basic plan lineups can prove challenging from a fiduciary perspective when it comes to manager oversight. Plans offering a high number of options obviously result in more money managers and subsequently more oversight requirements.”
Simplify, Simplify, Simplify
Less than one-third (29 percent) of plan sponsors offering 16 or more funds said that a measure of investment success is to “evaluate if projected participant income replacement ratios are being met at retirement,” the survey found. As a result, “It appears a number of plan sponsors are not only offering a high volume of funds, but are doing so with minimal focus on whether or not those funds are contributing to the goal of providing adequate retirement income,” concludes the report.
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM. Follow him on Twitter
To learn more about this topic, see:
Compensation & Benefits e-Newsletter:
To subscribe to SHRM's Compensation & Benefits e-newsletter, click below.
Sign Up Now
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies