New Professional Member Special>>> Save $15 and receive a SHRM tote bag
HR professionals can play a key role in creating business efficiency—starting with their own department.
Save $15 on a Professional Membership and Receive a FREE Tote Bag.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
We don't just visit a city, we take it over. Join us in NOLA -- June 18 - 21, 2017.
On June 27, 2014, the IRS released
Information Letter 2014-0012, which contains guidance for employees who have had the value of same-sex spousal coverage under employer health plans—which until recently was required to be included in gross income—reported on their Forms W-2.
Historically, the employer cost of opposite-sex spousal coverage under employer-provided health plans is tax free (Treasury Regulations section 1.106-1), while the employer cost of same-sex spousal coverage resulted in taxable income to the employee. Further, the employee cost of opposite-sex spousal coverage could be paid for on a pre-tax basis through a cafeteria plan (I.R.C. section 125), while same-sex spousal coverage could only be paid for with after-tax dollars.
In its June 2013
United States v. Windsor decision, the U.S. Supreme Court declared Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA)—which had prohibited the recognition of same-sex couples as spouses for federal tax law purposes—unconstitutional. Thereafter, the IRS issued guidance providing that same-sex spouses who were lawfully married under the law of any state—regardless of where those same-sex spouses resided—would be treated the same as opposite-sex spouses for federal tax purposes (Revenue Ruling 2013-17).
Subsequent IRS guidance clarified the tax treatment of the employer cost and the employee cost of same-sex spousal coverage: the former would not result in taxable income to the employee and the later could be paid on a pre-tax basis through a cafeteria plan (Notice 2014-1).
Information Letter 2014-0012
Information Letter 2014-0012 outlines two possible correction methods for an employee who has had the value of same-sex spousal health coverage reflected on a Form W-2:
Option One: The employee can ask the employer for a corrected Form W-2—that does not include the value of any excludable spousal health coverage in taxable wages—and use the corrected Form W-2 when filing the employee’s tax return.
Option Two: If the employer does not issue a corrected Form W-2, the employee can complete Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, or Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc.) pursuant to the instructions contained the Information Letter and file it with a completed Form 1040 and the uncorrected Form W-2.
The Information Letter also advises employees that they may be entitled to a refund of federal employment taxes (social security and Medicare) paid on the value of excludable spousal health coverage and provides two possible refund methods: an employer-sought refund and an employee-sought refund via Form 843 (Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement).
Key Take Away: Significantly, Information Letter 2014-0012 does notrequire employers to issue corrected Form W-2s or seek a refund of federal employment taxes. Accordingly, considerations of payroll department workload and employee relations can determine whether issuance of a corrected Form W-2 or the seeking of a refund is appropriate. Payroll departments who have not already done so should ensure their Form W-2 reporting and federal employment tax withholding aligns with
Windsor and subsequent IRS guidance.
Stephanie O. Zornis Of Counsel in the St. Louis office of
Jackson Lewis, a labor and employment law firm. © 2014, Jackson Lewis P.C. All Rights Reserved. Reposted with permission.
SHRM Seeks Clarification on DOL Proposed Rule Defining ‘Spouse,’SHRM Online Legal Issues, August 2014
More Post-Windsor Tax Guidance: IRS Issues Letter Outlining Steps for Individuals to Obtain Tax Refunds for Same-Sex Spousal Health Coverage, Proskauer’s ERISA Practice Center Blog, July 2014
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies