Support through your toughest HR challenges: A network of 285,000 HR professionals.
Shawn Premer shows how doing the right thing for employees leads to positive business results.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
By 2017, most plan to add surcharges or exclude spouses when coverage available elsewhere
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
To better control rising health care costs and minimize the risk of triggering the Affordable Care Act's
2018 excise tax, over the next three years a growing number of employers will make significant changes in how they subsidize health care coverage for their employees’ spouses and dependents.
Results from the 2014 Towers Watson
Health Care Changes Ahead Survey show that by 2017, 63 percent of midsize and large U.S. employers will add surcharges or exclude spouses from coverage when employer-sponsored health coverage is available elsewhere. The survey was fielded during July 2014 among employee benefit professionals from midsize to large U.S. companies that collectively employ 8.7 million workers.
“Health care coverage for spouses and dependents is a charged topic,” said Randall Abbott, a senior consultant for Towers Watson, in a statement announcing the findings. “Historically, virtually all large employers have offered and subsidized it, but it’s expensive. As employers seek to manage their expenditures, a growing number are rethinking their willingness to cover a working spouse who has a health benefit option elsewhere. The emphasis has been on increasing employee contributions or introducing surcharges, with a small percentage of employers actually excluding working spouses from coverage altogether.”
Results from an earlier survey, the Towers Watson/National Business Group on Health
Employer Survey on Purchasing value in Health Care, provide more insight into the specific actions employers are already taking. Fielded between November 2013 and January 2014 among employers with at least 1,000 employees, the survey shows that in 2014:
“These subsidy changes and surcharge levies are just some of the many changes employers continue to make to control costs,” said Abbott. “The overall goal is to manage costs and derive greater value for each dollar spent while also improving worker health, quality of care and health outcomes. The challenge for employers is that there is no single solution; rather, they must look across all program dimensions.”
Other Findings on Spousal/Dependent Coverage
According to Mercer's November 2014
National Survey of Employer-Sponsored Health Plans report, 9 percent of large employers now impose a surcharge on the premiums for spouses who have other coverage available, and another 9 percent make them ineligible for coverage altogether.
The median surcharge is an additional $100 per month, Mercer found.
The largest organizations, which tend to offer more generous coverage and can become “dependent magnets,” have moved the fastest to impose surcharges: 27 percent of employers with 20,000 or more employees did so in 2014, up from 20 percent in 2013. However, only 5 percent of these jumbo employers exclude spouses with other coverage.
Mercer’s survey included public and private organizations with 10 or more employees; 2,569 employers responded in 2014.
research findings released by consultancy Aon Hewitt in November 2014 confirm the shift toward reduced eligibility and subsidies for spouses and dependents among midsize and large U.S. employers. Among the findings:
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM. Follow him on Twitter
Related SHRM Articles
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Talent Attraction Study: What Matters to the Modern Candidate
SHRM Annual Conference & Exposition
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies