New Member Promotion Ends 9/30 >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Employers are offering creative perks to attract and retain today’s workers.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Prepare for your exam with the guidance of a SHRM-certified instructor in Boston, Oct. 24-26.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
Beyond financial incentives, well-rounded programs spur participation
With the role of financial incentives in employer-provided wellness programs currently being sorted out (the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued a long-awaited proposed rule for comment in April 2015), focus has fallen on ways to better engage employees in health-promotion efforts beyond paying them to participate.
A May 2015 research brief from the nonprofit Rand Corp., Incentives for Workplace Wellness Programs, offers some useful insights. Rand’s researchers found that “while incentives increase employee uptake among programs with limited services, offering a comprehensive program is almost as effective.”
The researchers compared “limited” wellness initiatives with “comprehensive” programs. The latter included a broad range of health-screening, lifestyle-improvement and disease-management services, while the former limited services across one or more of these components.
The researchers found that:
• Employers that did not use incentives reported lower participation rates—a median of just 20 percent of employees.
• With the use of incentives, median participation rates increased to 40 percent.
• Employers offering rewards of more than $100 reported participation rates of 51 percent, compared with 36 percent for those with smaller rewards.
• Employers offering comprehensive programs reported participation rates of 59 percent, and participation in these programs was less sensitive to the types of incentives provided.
“While incentives seem to be effective at increasing program uptake, they are not a panacea,” the researchers concluded. “Offering a rich, well-designed program is almost as effective at boosting employee participation rates as incentivizing employees to join more-limited ones.”
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies