Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Don't leave the task of calculating total cost of workforce to the finance department.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
Long-term incentives and annual bonuses outpaced salary rise
Annual compensation for CEOs at large U.S. companies rose 6 percent in 2016, slightly more than the 4 percent increase that corporate leaders received the previous year and down significantly from a 12.1 percent increase in 2014. But last year's executive pay raise was
still about double the 3 percent increase that most nonexecutive employees saw.
Increases in CEO compensation remained moderate due to uneven corporate performance, a continuing shift to variable pay and a sharp decrease in the value of stock option exercises, according to an analysis by Willis Towers Watson. The consultancy examined S&P 1500 companies that had not changed CEOs from 2015 to 2016, as reported in company proxy statements filed through March of this year.
"The modest increase in CEO pay should come as no surprise in view of the relatively lackluster financial performance of companies in many sectors of the economy in 2016," said R.J. Bannister, head of Willis Towers Watson's executive compensation consulting practice in North America. "A strong second half offset a weak first half, resulting in generally flat to moderate performance improvement over several performance metrics."
But with signs that economic conditions may improve this year, along with discussions in Washington about tax reform and possible legislative efforts to repeal or limit the
executive pay provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act, "companies will need to carefully monitor and manage their executive pay programs to ensure they maintain a strong link between pay and performance," Bannister said.
The analysis broke out the components of CEO pay as follows:
Shareholders still support executive pay decisions. Through March 31, shareholder approval for say-on-pay resolutions averaged 92 percent—roughly the same level of support as in each of the first five years of mandatory say-on-pay shareholder voting as required by the Dodd-Frank Act.
[SHRM members-only toolkit: Designing Executive Compensation Plans]
Long-Term Performance Metrics.
LTI plans continue to evolve toward performance-based metrics as opposed to time-vested rewards. The analysis showed that the most common LTI metrics were:
Year-End Bonus Adjustments
Almost one in five companies made discretionary adjustments to annual bonus payouts at the end of 2016. About a third (34 percent) of these companies increased payments, and nearly half (48 percent) decreased payments, while others did some of both or added additional incentive awards.
"Companies are primarily using discretion in incentive payments to strengthen the pay and performance link, with virtually all of the adjustments being made to annual payments," Bannister said. "More than a third of the companies that used discretion to make adjustments cited strengthening the link between pay and performance as the reason."
Adjustments were most often made for exceptional, one-time events that the board's compensation committee viewed as significant although not part of the plan performance metrics. "This illustrates that compensation committees are exercising discretion and making payout adjustments to consider performance holistically, to motivate employees and to ensure payouts are fair based on what management can control," Bannister noted.
CEO Pay at the Biggest Firms
Separately, an analysis by the
Wall Street Journal reported that last year
CEO pay at S&P 500 companies—the largest U.S. firms—rose 6.8 percent, with most of the increase awarded in various forms of restricted stock or stock options to link leaders' pay with long-term corporate performance. David Yermack, a finance professor at New York University’s Stern School of Business, told the
Journal that regular shareholder votes on executive pay have forced boards "to do their homework" in better tying CEO pay packages to performance.
Others contend that companies could still do more to link leaders’ pay with long-term corporate performance, noting that some of the best-paid CEOs were at companies in turmoil. For instance, the
Journal reported that Philippe Dauman, who was forced out as chief of media giant Viacom in August, made $93 million during the year.
Related SHRM Articles:
CEO Pay Dips for First Time in 5 Years,
SHRM Online Compensation, August 2016
CEOs Vastly Overpaid, Most Americans Say,
SHRM Online Compensation, March 2016
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies