Finally get that promotion? Get exclusive content, tips and tools to help you excel.
Implicit bias occurs when individuals make judgments about people based on gender, race or other prohibited factors without even realizing they’re doing it.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Perks remain on the chopping block
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
CEO pay at top U.S. public companies rose in 2013 by the largest percentage since 2010, in part because shareholders experienced record-breaking performance, according to results from
The Wall Street Journal/Hay Group 2013 CEO Compensation Study. Compensation for top executives increasingly is linked to total shareholder return (TSR) according to the study, which focused on compensation for CEOs of the 300 largest public companies by revenue to file proxy statements by April 30, 2014.
Following two years of only modest increases to total compensation, CEOs experienced a material uptick in pay in 2013:
In sum, total direct compensation increased 5.5 percent to just more than $11.4 million.
While the median rise in pay was greater in 2013 than in the two years prior, it lagged significantly behind the growth in company net income and TSR. In 2013, the median company showed a net income growth of 8 percent and a TSR of 33.8 percent. That's compared to a modest 2.1 percent median net income growth and a still-strong 16.3 percent TSR in 2012.
"Companies and their shareholders experienced a banner year in 2013, but increases to executive payouts remained modest by comparison as compensation committees continued to be cautious about shareholder perception of executive pay," said Irv Becker, national practice leader of the U.S. executive compensation practice at Hay Group. "This year's results reflect the ongoing impact shareholder activism has on how companies approach and communicate their executive pay plans, with boards increasingly focusing on performance-based design elements."
For the third year in a row, long-term performance plans (equity and cash) were the most heavily weighted piece of the entire pay puzzle, making up 32.3 percent of the average CEO's total direct compensation, up from 30.3 percent in 2012. Bonuses were the second-heaviest weighted component of pay, making up 22 percent of the average CEO's total direct compensation, compared to 23.2 percent in 2012.
"Performance awards continue to be the most important executive pay element in the eyes of shareholders," said David Wise, vice president and market leader in the Northeast U.S. for Hay Group, in the same release. "While some companies implement them to appeal to shareholder concerns, more companies are using these plans as roadmaps for the execution of their long-term strategies.”
Other key findings from the 2014 study include:
“During the past several years, companies have taken large strides toward bulletproofing their CEO pay plans, but in today's
say on pay era, compensation programs continue to face immense scrutiny," said Becker. "Looking ahead, it will be critical for compensation committees to continue to address shareholder concerns and 'hot button' issues, while also ensuring that pay programs are tailored to the strategic needs of their company."
Say on Pay Votes Reflect Shareholder Approval, with Exceptions
Based on 2014 shareholder
“say on pay” voting results reported through May 16, the 91 percent average support for executive pay in 2014 is consistent with the 90 percent support observed over all of 2013, according to a report by consultancy Towers Watson.
At companies that failed say on pay votes, engagement activities and compensation program changes often fell short of fully addressing shareholder concerns, according to the report. Moreover, at companies with failed votes, leadership often was concentrated with the CEO, who was frequently the company founder or occupied both the CEO and board chairman roles with no additional independent board leadership.
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM. Follow him on Twitter
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies