Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Make sure supervisors know these common justifications for harassment are unacceptable.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
On June 4, 2009, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) released Notice 2009-49 clarifying that, for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s acquisition of equity interests in financial institutions or other companies under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA) does not constitute a permissible "change in control" event that would trigger payments under nonqualified deferred compensation plans.
Code Section 409A sets forth requirements applicable to nonqualified deferred compensation plans, including the timing of payment. For instance, one of the permissible payment triggers includes a change of control as defined in Code Section 409A and applicable regulations. Subsequent to the enactment of Code Section 409A in 2004 and the issuance of final regulations in 2007, the Treasury Department established the Troubled Asset Relief Program under the EESA to help restore liquidity and stability to the financial markets. Under this program, the Treasury Department may participate in various transactions with financial institutions and other entities involving the acquisition of their preferred stock, common stock, warrants to purchase common stock and other types of equity (referred to in the notice as a “Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction”). Because the Treasury Department’s program was introduced after the final Code Section 409A regulations, there was some uncertainty regarding whether a Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction could, under any circumstances, constitute a change in control event for purposes of Code Section 409A—that is, whether such a transaction constitutes a permissible payment trigger for nonqualified deferred compensation.
IRS and Treasury Position
The notice concludes that a Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction does not constitute a change in control event for purposes of Code Section 409A. According to the notice, treating a Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction as a change in control event could reduce the liquidity of the financial institution or other entity, which is directly contrary to the purpose of a Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction.
The IRS and the Treasury Department intend to amend the final regulations issued under Code Section 409A to incorporate the guidance set forth in the notice, effective for Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transactions entered into on or after June 4, 2009. The notice confirms that a nonqualified deferred compensation plan does not need to be amended to provide explicitly that a Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction will not trigger a payment under the plan.
Finally, the notice indicates that it does not address whether a Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction constitutes a change in control event for any other purpose. However, in practice, the specific terms of each Treasury EESA Equity Acquisition Transaction likely will require the company to amend its change in control arrangements to ensure that payments are not triggered by the acquisition.
Joseph S. Adams, a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLPwho is based in the firm’s Chicago office, concentrates his practice on employee benefits and executive compensation matters for public, private and tax-exempt. Raymond M. Fernando, a partner in the firm's Chicago office, concentrates his practice on employee compensation and benefits, including the design, administration, and restructuring of tax-qualified and non-qualified retirement plans, incentive compensation, equity compensation, and deferred compensation programs.Andrew C. Liazos, a partner in the Boston office, heads the firm's executive compensation group.
Six-Month Wait for Deferred Compensation Widely Misunderstood, SHRM Online Legal Issues, September 2009
Deferred Comp: Most Admired Make Widespread Use of Nonqualified Plans, SHRM Online Compensation Discipline, February 2007
SHRM Online Compensation Discipline
SHRM Salary Survey Directory
SHRM Compensation Data Center
Sign up for SHRM’s free Compensation & Benefits e-newsletter
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]