New Member Promotion Ends 9/30 >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Employers are offering creative perks to attract and retain today’s workers.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Prepare for your exam with the guidance of a SHRM-certified instructor in Boston, Oct. 24-26.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
Companies are eliminating shareholder irritants and highlighting performance-based incentives
The fourth year for mandatory
say-on-pay votes is off to a relatively positive start, based on Towers Watson’s analysis of proxy statements. Among publicly traded U.S. companies that disclosed their shareholder voting results in the first quarter of 2014:
“Most companies are managing their executive compensation programs thoughtfully, responding to continuing pressure from stakeholders to ensure a strong link between pay and performance,” said Todd Lippincott, North America leader of executive compensation consulting at Towers Watson.
Fifteen percent of companies provided detailed disclosure in their proxy statement's Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of measures they took to engage with shareholders regarding executive compensation. Half of those companies made changes in their pay programs or disclosures in response to shareholder feedback.
“Companies have been adapting their executive compensation programs for the say-on-pay environment by eliminating pay irritants, such as tax gross-ups and excessive perquisites, and increasing the emphasis on performance-based incentives,” Lippincott said. “We expect this proxy season to be relatively quiet, although there will always be a few companies where shareholders voice their displeasure through say-on-pay votes.”
The analysis, based on S&P 1500 companies that filed by late March proxies disclosing 2013 pay, noted that:
The analysis also found that the mix of executive long-term incentives continues to shift to performance-based plans:
Total shareholder return remains the most prevalent performance metric that companies use in their long-term incentive plans. Four in 10 companies (39 percent) that offer performance awards used this measure in 2013, while 32 percent used earnings per share.
Pay Programs Align with Proxy Advisors’ Guidelines
A new study by Mercer finds that the impact of proxy advisory firms—which provide institutional shareholders with voting recommendations—is increasing as more organizations try to align programs with advisors’ guidelines.
According to the consultancy's annual
Executive Rewards Survey report—based on responses from more than 215 employers across all industries throughout the U.S. and Canada—changes to short- and long-term incentive programs, use of special retention grants, and grant values have increased in 2014 as a result of proxy advisors’ guidelines.
One notable change in plan designs on which both the Towers Watson and Mercer analyses concur is the continued shift away from stock options relative to the increased use of performance awards in delivering long-term incentives to executives. Mercer's findings show that few organizations are making changes to current stock option plans, while 10 percent of organizations are planning to increase the use of performance shares in 2014 and 5 percent are increasing use of restricted stock. (For more on this trend, see the
SHRM Online article "Managing a Shift Away from Stock Options.")
Stephen Miller, CEBS, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
Related External Articles:
Related SHRM Articles:
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies