New Member Promotion >>> Save $15 and get a SHRM tote!
Giving applicants with criminal backgrounds a fair chance at employment can be good for business.
Plus all the HR resources you need to be more efficient and effective this fall!
Apply for the SHRM Certification Exam and begin advancing your career.
Learn how to make the business case for diversity, October 25-27.
Research on employee engagement often contains advice for employers on how to maximize engagement—and the importance of sustaining such efforts long-term.
For example, even though 67 percent of employees at nearly 5,000 Best Places to Work Survey organizations in the U.S. were engaged at the end of 2011, engagement has yet to return to pre-recession levels, the report noted.
The 2012 Employee Engagement Trends Report released March 9, 2012, by Quantum Workplace contained an analysis of 10 areas of engagement: teamwork, manager effectiveness, trust in senior leaders, trust with co-workers, retention, alignment with goals, feeling valued, individual contribution, job satisfaction and benefits. Quantum found that the strongest overall engagement levels were associated with:
Quantum concluded that organizations that do very well in these three areas “will have a very high level of overall engagement.”
Globally, 58 percent of employees were engaged in 2011, up from 56 percent in 2010, according to a report released June 4, 2012, by Aon Hewitt, a global HR consultancy. The data gathered during the first quarter of 2012, from more than 3,100 of Aon Hewitt’s client organizations, represents 9.7 million employees around the world.
Aon Hewitt noted that employers in two areas of the world achieved engagement levels exceeding the global average: Latin America, at 71 percent, and North America, at 64 percent.
Employees in Europe were least engaged, at 52 percent.
Other findings give employers further issues to consider.
For example, Aon Hewitt found that, around the world, those from the Baby Boomer generation (born 1946 to 1964) were far more engaged than their younger colleagues. Millennial-aged workers (born after 1979) were the least engaged.
Similarly, across all geographic regions, executive and senior management level workers were far more engaged than employees at other levels. Notably, those working in professional level positions were least engaged, even when compared to those who often have the least autonomy and variety in their work: front-line employees.
By function, HR professionals around the world were far more engaged than those in finance, operations, IT and other functional areas reviewed by Aon Hewitt. HR professionals are often charged with administering engagement surveys.
Increasing Employee Engagement Levels
“As the economy improves, retaining top talent is going to be difficult. Now is the time for organizations to measure and gain insights on engagement drivers and to start doing the work necessary to improve engagement,” said Pete Sanborn, co-president of Global Compensation and Talent at Aon Hewitt, in a statement.
Thus, the Aon Hewitt report lists workplace activities and programs most likely to have a positive impact on engagement, based on research. These include:
Employee engagement is not something that organizations can simply manufacture; employees must be active participants in the engagement process.
According to The Employee Engagement Mindset (McGraw-Hill, 2012), highly engaged employees share six behavioral drivers:
Engaged Employee Backlash
However, just because a high percentage of employees are deemed to be engaged at a particular organization doesn’t mean they will stay engaged, academic research finds. “Even model employees can ‘give up’ if they sense that they’re being asked to do more and more, and with fewer resources, while comparatively little is being asked of their less-engaged colleagues,” said Wayne Hochwarter, the Jim Moran Professor of Business Administration in the Florida State University College of Business, in a statement released May 31, 2012.
Hochwarter surveyed 1,000 people in blue- and white-collar occupations and concluded that engaged employees work harder and are more creative and committed than disengaged employees. Engaged respondents reported a:
Yet, Hochwarter found that engaged workers might exhibit a number of undesirable attitudes and behaviors without appropriate company support and resources. Engagement often means taking on more tasks than one’s less-engaged co-workers and the expectation that the company will provide more of what is needed to assist along the way, he explained. Absent such resources, Hochwarter found, engaged employees began to display characteristics such as:
“Getting employees engaged is like planting a tree,” Hochwarter noted. “If you walk away from it, it’s unlikely to grow.”
Rebecca R. Hastings, SPHR, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies