NEW Professional Member Special>>> Save $20 and receive a SHRM tote bag
More companies are recognizing the importance of giving employees the time and space they need to navigate personal loss.
Save $20 on a New Professional Membership and receive a FREE Tote bag when you join SHRM today!
Learn to overcome challenges and meet your 2017 goals through competency-based HR education. Available in-person and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
Employment of people with disabilities lags significantly behind other gains made since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in 1990, according to two surveys.
Two-thirds of those responding to a poll by Professor Lex Frieden of the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston said the ADA has been “the most significant social, cultural or legislative influence on their lives” since President George H.W. Bush signed it on July 26, 1990.
More than 90 percent of the 870 U.S.-based respondents surveyed by Frieden said the quality of life for people with disabilities has improved greatly, especially regarding access to retail businesses and other public places, as well as in transportation, community and independent living, government services, education and telecommunications.
However, almost half of those polled put employment as one of the areas where the ADA has had the smallest impact on their lives.
“Some of the ‘fear’ that employers have had and myths about people with disabilities have been allayed,” said one respondent quoted in the Frieden survey. “Companies like Wal-Mart are willing for a person with a disability to be the first person you see when you enter the store—breaking down a lot of attitudinal barriers. There is still discrimination in employment, but not like there was before.”
Frieden, who has been disabled since a car accident in 1967, is former executive director of the National Council on the Handicapped and was one of the authors of the ADA. From 2002 to 2006 he chaired the National Council on Disability. He labeled his poll “nonscientific” and characterizes its respondents as “disability community leaders.”
Other statements by those responding to the Frieden poll:
At a news conference at the National Press Club on July 22, 2010, Frieden called employment of disabled people “an area of gain [under the ADA] but also a big disappointment. … They expected more.”
“Expected more” is the theme of another 20th anniversary examination of the ADA’s effectiveness, made by the Kessler Foundation and the National Organization on Disability (NOD). Those organizations report that employment “is still the area where people with disabilities seem to be at the greatest disadvantage compared to the rest of the population.”
The poll was conducted by the polling organization Harris Interactive. Some of its findings:
This is the sixth time since 1986 that Harris has surveyed the attitudes and experiences of people with disabilities for Kessler and the NOD. According to Harris, the surveys have used a consistent sampling approach and methodology; the latest effort sampled 1,001 U.S.-based adults with disabilities and 788 adults without disabilities. For questions about employment, Harris says, it used an oversample of 315 workers with disabilities.
Some other findings from the Harris poll:
Like the Frieden survey, the Harris poll inquired about accommodation and quality-of-life matters and asked questions about overall satisfaction with the ADA. In that area, the Harris results were the reverse of Frieden’s. Just 24 percent of people with disabilities told the Harris pollsters that the ADA has made their lives better. Four percent said the ADA has made their lives worse, and 61 percent said the act has made no difference in their lives. In 10 indicators of economic and lifestyle quality, the Harris poll showed little or no meaningful gain.
Harris weighted its findings by age group to reflect their shares of the general population. That, said Frieden, might account for the difference in results, because people born after 1990 have no way of assessing the changes the ADA has brought, and older respondents, if they acquired their disabilities since 1990, lack a frame of reference.
Frieden stressed the areas where the two surveys agreed, most notably about the employment gap for people with disabilities. “Bottom line,” he said, “We need to work aggressively… to find solutions for people who need employment.”
When SHRM Online asked for specific suggestions, Frieden said, “We need to have equal opportunity. We don’t have [enough] job fairs that include outreach to disabled people. [Employers] don’t attend to disabled groups on college campuses.”
Companies, he continued, should educate middle managers who typically are faced with the need to fill vacancies quickly and under pressure: “Those people will choose folks that look like the last person who did the job well,” rather than expanding their fields of consideration to include those with disabilities.
Appearing with Frieden at the National Press Club was James G. Carlson, chairman and CEO of Amerigroup, a Virginia Beach, Va., company that provides health insurance services to publicly sponsored programs, including Medicaid and Medicare.
Speaking of his company’s workers with disabilities, Carlson said, “We’ve learned that when we can make accommodations, they’re among our most dedicated employees.”
He called the ADA’s impact on business a “non-issue.” Continued Carlson, “Since the business community was foretelling doom and gloom” when the ADA was passed, “all we’ve done is preside over the biggest economic expansion in years.”
Steve Taylor is a freelance writer based in Arlington, Va.
Has the Americans with Disabilities Act Made a Difference?SHRM Online Diversity Discipline, July 9, 2010
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies