Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018.
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 14 cities across the U.S. this fall.
Gain the skills you need to rise to the next level in your career. Jon us at SHRM's Leadership Development Forum, October 2-3 in Boston.
Yet instead of driving the survey process from the top and holding individual supervisors accountable for retention results—like they do for other business results—CEOs are more likely to say “HR: go fix it” when engagement survey results are lower than desired.
And that’s why the employee survey process is a “broken model,” said Finnegan during a Society for Human Resource Management webcast held Feb. 23, 2012. Instead of driving retention efforts through top-down, executive-driven processes—as is common for sales, service, quality and safety efforts—employee retention is often driven “from the side” with programs like surveys, employee appreciation weeks and newsletters.
But he said organizations will be able to increase employee engagement and retention—ostensibly the goal of such surveys—by only a small amount if they focus solely on HR programs.
The missing link, Finnegan said, is supervisors. “You just won’t get up the hill if supervisors don’t supervise effectively,” he said.
Finnegan referenced a New York Times article, published March 12, 2011, which summarized Google’s research into the supervisory qualities its employees value most. “What employees valued most were even-keeled bosses who made time for one-on-one meetings; who helped people puzzle through problems by asking questions, not dictating answers; and who took an interest in employees’ lives and careers,” the article said.
That’s not to say that employee engagement efforts driven by HR are unimportant, however. Finnegan summarized the ideal balance this way:
“You have to have both to win,” he said. “If you have to have just one, however, you are better off having good supervisors.”
Webinar participants were asked how frequently they conduct employee attitude or engagement surveys. Of the approximately 400 people who responded to the poll question, just 7 percent said they survey employees more than once a year. In such an environment, managers will have to wait an entire year to find out if their efforts impact engagement.
More troubling is the response to a second poll question, which revealed that “nothing really happens,” according to 64 percent of respondents, if a particular manager has consistently low employee survey results.
Twenty-seven percent of respondents said a note might be made on a supervisor’s performance appraisal. Less than one in 10 said the manager would be held accountable for their results.
“This is lip service,” Finnegan said, particularly because there’s an obvious link between poor supervision and low employee engagement.
Finnegan suggested that organizations:
Rebecca R. Hastings, SPHR, is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies