Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Here is how HR can help prevent the missteps that could cost your company big in court.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) had to defend its organizing tactics to a jury for the first time ever and lost when a jury found that it wrongfully interfered with the unionizing target's business relations.
The SEIU's overly aggressive organizing proved to be costly for the union, which has been ordered to pay $7.8 million to Professional Janitorial Service of Houston (PJS).
PJS has been fighting the organizing drive for nearly 10 years, filing suit against the union on May 3, 2007. During that time, the SEIU intentionally tried to harm the company by costing it business, according to Kevin Troutman, an attorney with Fisher Phillips in Houston.
"What is unusual about this case is that PJS fought these tactics all the way through trial," noted Phillip Wilson, president and general counsel of the Labor Relations Institute, a labor relations consulting firm based in Broken Arrow, Okla. "Most employers aren't willing to go the distance."
The SEIU filed many claims during its corporate campaign, including:
The union stated in its handbills, speeches and rallies that PJS regularly withheld pay, forced employees to work off the clock and engaged in unfair labor practices—statements that were found to be untrue, Troutman noted.
The SEIU also interfered with PJS's relationships with customers; about 12 companies ended their relationships with PJS. One customer severed her relationship with PJS after the union stormed her office and occupied her conference rooms to protest her hiring PJS, Troutman noted.
The local union had celebrations every time PJS lost business, he added.
A jury awarded PJS $5.3 million on Sept. 6, and the court awarded that amount and an additional $2.5 in prejudgment interest on Sept. 26.
New Path for Employers
"Results like this should encourage other companies to follow suit," Wilson said.
The case gives employers a new tack they can consider taking and "a path for employers to push back" when there is a corporate campaign, Troutman said.
Rather than accept cards signed by employees in favor of joining a union, PJS insisted that the SEIU would need to win a secret-ballot election to represent PJS workers. This gave birth to the union's "all-out" corporate campaign, said Peter List, CEO of Kulture, a national labor employment consultancy based in the Charleston, S.C., area.
Some employers targeted by unions sign neutrality agreements, making it possible for a union to easily organize, according to Troutman.
But he advised those companies that resist unionization to track e-mails and fliers so they have evidence if they go to trial that a union has made spurious allegations and wrongfully interfered with the organization's business relations. "If the union knows you're tracking it, the union might back off and not be quite as over-the-top as SEIU was in this case," he said.
Good relations with employees are essential to find out what the union is saying, he added. "Find out as much as you can about a union" that is seeking to organize a workplace, Troutman recommended.
The case underscores the fact that HR professionals can stand their ground and talk to their employees, telling them, " 'I don't believe it's in the best interest of the company to be represented by a union,' " he said.
"The decision is another opportunity for the strategic HR professional to advise the C-suite when the company is under attack with a corporate campaign begun by a union," said Michael Lotito, an attorney with Littler in San Francisco and co-chair of the Workplace Policy Institute, the firm's government relations branch. "Most businesspeople are not familiar with these tactics or the law surrounding them and believe that 'there has to be a law against this economic terrorism.' Well, now there may at least be a jury decision out there."
The SEIU plans to appeal the decision.
This case is Professional Janitorial Service of Houston Inc. v. Service Employees International Union Local 5, D. Harris County, Texas, No. 2007-27181 (Sept. 26, 2016).
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Don’t Lose Sight! What Does Poor Preventive Care Cost Your Business?
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies