Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Here is how HR can help prevent the missteps that could cost your company big in court.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
Senior managers still rely on “gut feelings” when making decisions because of limited access to enterprise-wide data and analytical talent, according to the findings of a survey released in February 2010 by talent acquisition firm Accenture Inc.
Weak analytics capabilities―related to siloed data, outdated technology and a lack of analytical talent―are preventing organizations from gaining valuable insight that could lead to better business results, according to the survey of 600 senior managers at more than 500 blue-chip organizations in the United States, the United Kingdom and Ireland; more than half of those respondents said their organizations are structured in a way that prevents data and analytical talent from generating enterprise-wide insight.
For example, 45 percent of respondents said data are housed in isolated parts of their organization, and more than half the respondents (52 percent) said that analytical talent is housed separately from the relevant data at their organization. In addition, nearly 30 percent of U.S. respondents, and 13 percent of their counterparts, said that their organizations do not have any professionals dedicated to analytics.
Overall, four out of 10 respondents said that their organization’s current technological resources and systems hinder the effective use of enterprise-wide analytics greatly. In addition, 51 percent said they have more opportunities to use analytics to improve the business than they have analytical resources to exploit them. Respondents from companies in nearly every industry represented in the survey acknowledged that they must improve the consistency, accuracy and completeness of their data before they can become more ambitious in terms of their analytics capabilities.
“While there are many tools that enable organizations to examine historical data, what’s needed is the ability to properly identify and analyze the data and gain the insight that enables one to make better decisions,” said Dave Rich, managing director of the Accenture Analytics Group. “Organizations that fail to tackle the issues around data, technology and analytics talent will lose out to the high-performing 10 percent who have leveraged predictive analytics to become more agile and adaptive―and gain competitive advantage.”
Where There’s a Will …
Despite the apparent lack of analytics capabilities, the companies surveyed are committed to developing these capabilities. For example, 71 percent of respondents said that their organization’s senior management is “totally” or “highly” committed to analytics and fact-based decision-making. In addition, 46 percent said that among the long-term goals of their senior management teams are applying analytics in useful areas of the business and becoming more analytical in decision-making styles and methods across their businesses. The most widespread long-term analytical priority noted among organizations surveyed was developing the capability to model and predict behavior, actions and decisions—cited by between two-thirds and three-quarters of respondents in each industry sector, respectively.
But the research revealed that senior managers fail to see fact- and data-driven analysis as critical when making key business decisions and instead rely heavily on “gut feel” and “soft” factors such as consultation, intuition and experience.
Further, some organizations are making analytics-based decisions using flawed data; the survey identified issues related to the consistency, accuracy, completeness and format of company data applied to analytical decision-making. When rating each of these fundamental aspects of data quality on a scale of 1 to 5 (where 1 equals “not at all clean” and 5 equals “extremely clean”), the rating for each hardly rose above 3. For each of these aspects of data quality, U.S. respondents rated the quality of their data lower than their U.K. and Irish counterparts rated the quality of their data.
The findings indicate that little has changed since 2008, when a previous Accenture survey found that 40 percent of business decisions were based on judgment rather than business analytics, often attributable to a lack of good data.
“Accenture’s findings reinforce a key challenge—and opportunity—that we face today: Businesses and government organizations are dealing with a flood of information that overwhelms the human ability to process,” said Russ Cobb, vice president of Alliances and Marketing at SAS. “Decision-makers then revert to best guesses rather than making empirical decisions. But with predictive analytics, we can derive the critical insights from the data that will lead to optimal business outcomes.”
Along with the quality of corporate data, security issues are limiting the more widespread and sophisticated use of business analytics significantly, the survey reveals. Two-thirds of respondents overall said that data security concerns are having at least a moderate impact in preventing their organizations from extending the use of data analysis and business intelligence, with respondents in the public sector more likely than their private-sector counterparts to cite this factor (80 percent vs. 65 percent).
In addition, organizations are failing to tap into one of the most innovative capabilities of analytics: the ability to predict business events in order to act before the events occur. For example, the survey found that when it comes to examining market growth, only about one-third (36 percent) of respondents said their organizations use the predictive analytics function to a “great extent,” and more than one-fifth (22 percent) said they do not even use it to a moderate extent. And while some organizations do analyze data to predict what might happen in terms of competitor activities, market trends, product or service development, risk management, financial and economic trends and skill requirements, many organizations are still using predictive analytics only to a minor extent, if at all.
“This is a huge opportunity that organizations are failing to harness,” said Rich. “The need for speed in decision-making is a key competitive differentiator, and lacking the insight into customers’ preferences means mounting an expensive come-from-behind response. During previous downturns, companies that thrived used data-derived insights made by informed decision-makers to produce lasting competitive advantage. We believe that predictive analytics will be the difference between the winners and losers in the next economic cycle.”
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Choose from dozens of free webcasts on the most timely HR topics.
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies