Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Change can be scary, but deploying new HR software doesn't have to be.
Is your employee handbook ready for the New Year? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Get the HR education you need without travel expenses or time out of the office.
We don’t just visit a city, we take it over. Join the HR community in NOLA -- June 18-21, 2017.
California was a pioneer when it adopted the country’s first and—to date—only state-level heat illness prevention standard in 2005. Now the state’s Division of Occupational Safety and Health, known as Cal/OSHA, has proposed significant revisions to the regulations, potentially to be effective by 2015, if finalized.
The proposed revisions are in draft form and have been submitted to the Cal/OSHA Standards Board. If the board approves the proposal, formal rulemaking, including a public comment period, would begin.
“The proposal will enhance the safety of employees by clarifying the current requirements for providing water and shade to workers, minimizing disincentives for drinking water and taking rest periods, requiring additional observation and training during high-heat periods, and improving procedures for accessing first aid and emergency medical services,” said California Department of Industrial Relations Director Christine Baker, in the draft proposal sent to the board.
The deaths of seven workers have been confirmed as heat-related fatalities in the state since 2012. “We don’t want any illnesses or deaths related to heat, and these changes will raise the bar to prevent that from happening,” said Baker, whose department oversees Cal/OSHA.
The regulations apply to all employers with outdoor places of employment, although certain industries—agriculture, construction, landscaping, and oil and gas extraction—must follow additional high-heat procedures when temperatures hit a certain degree.
Among the proposed revisions:
The California Chamber of Commerce and a coalition of business partners, which includes the Western Agricultural Processors Association and the Associated General Contractors of California, are concerned that the proposed changes are unnecessary and burdensome.
“This proposal is unprecedented in its overly prescriptive approach,” said Marti Fisher, policy advocate for the Chamber of Commerce, based in Sacramento. “This micromanaging of workplaces is in conflict with Cal/OSHA’s long-standing practice to provide performance rather than prescriptive standards.”
Fisher said employers have a high rate of compliance with the current regulations and Cal/OSHA has not shown the need nor provided any evidence of necessity to justify the proposed changes. Cal/OSHA’s own data show similar findings, citing “steady progress” in increasing employer compliance with the current heat illness prevention regulations. Citations are issued most frequently for not preparing written heat illness prevention plans properly or a lack of employee training, rather than providing insufficient water or access to shade, according to information shared with the Cal/OSHA Advisory Committee in 2013.
Jackson Lewis attorney Tressi Cordaro agrees that the lack of data supporting the proposed revisions is troubling. “A lot of the rationale behind the proposed amendments is the Division’s experience and/or observations in the field, rather than any specific data suggesting there remains a significant risk of injury to heat-related illnesses under the current standard,” she said.
“While the Division claims that the proposed amendments attempt to clarify the current requirements, the revisions create greater ambiguity. For example, the amendments require that water provided must be ‘fresh, pure and suitably cool.’ What does ‘pure’ mean? What does ‘suitably cool’ mean? And how does an employer trying to avoid a citation make that determination when providing water to employees?”
In addition to regulatory efforts, Gov. Jerry Brown amended California’s labor code June 28, 2014, when he signed into law a bill requiring workers to be paid during mandated rest and recovery periods in jobs where there is a high risk of heat-related illness and injury, such as agriculture, landscaping and transportation. Current law requires employers to provide workers exposed to extreme heat at least a five-minute rest and recovery period in the shade, but workers often don’t take advantage of these breaks because they’re unpaid, according to the bill’s sponsor, Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Pacoima.
Roy Maurer is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
Follow him @SHRMRoy
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies