Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
A new employee in the health and safety department complains that the company’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 300 log is not accurate based upon her previous experience at a different employer who recorded injuries differently. The employee refuses to acknowledge OSHA guidance documents and regulations showing that injuries are being properly recorded and changes the log to reflect her view of how to properly record injuries. The employee becomes abusive, threatening and insubordinate when challenged. She threatens to call OSHA if the log is not “corrected” as she has demanded.
If the company has determined that the information in the OSHA 300 log is accurate and has addressed the employee’s concerns by using OSHA guidance documents and regulations to show that the injuries are being properly recorded, it has no further duty to the employee. However, the employer does have a duty to properly record injuries and cannot allow the employee to change the log to add incorrect data. Thus, the company should make sure the incorrect information added or deleted by the employee is immediately corrected. It may also want to consider restricting the employee’s access to the OSHA 300 log.
The company has the right to discipline the employee as it deems necessary, but should keep in mind that if the employee is disciplined, it is likely that the employee will file an OSHA whistle-blower retaliation claim.
The company should be prepared to respond to an OSHA investigation by:
Nothing. The employee has the right to call OSHA and the employer should under no circumstance reprimand or discharge the employee as a result of the complaints about the OSHA 300 log or the employee’s threat to call OSHA.
OSHA Section 11(c), 29 U.S.C. § 660(c) states that “no person shall discharge or in any manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has filed any complaint or instituted or caused to be instituted any proceeding under or related to this Act ...” To establish a prima facie case of retaliation under Section 11(c) of the Act, Complainant is required to show that (1) she engaged in protected activity, (2) the employer knew about that activity, (3) the employer subjected her to an adverse employment action, and (4) a causal connection existed between the protected activity and the adverse action. In order to make a valid Section 11(c) claim, the protected activity must have been a motivating factor in the decision to terminate the employee.
Can the employee be reprimanded or discharged for her abusive, threatening and insubordinate behavior now that she has made a threat to call OSHA?
Yes, but because the employee’s abusive behavior is bound up with her threat to call OSHA (i.e., protected activity), the employer must be very careful. To avoid a situation that looks like the employee was reprimanded or discharged as a result of the complaints or the threat to call OSHA, the company should document every instance of “bad behavior” and counsel or “warn” the employee before a discharge. In other words, the employer wants to be in the best position possible to show that the protected activity was not a motivating factor in the decision to terminate the employee, but rather the decision to terminate was based on the employee’s inappropriate conduct.
Emma Mata is a partner in the commercial litigation and health care practice groups of the Houston office of
Republished with permission. © 2014 Seyfarth Shaw. All rights reserved.
SHRM Online Safety & Security page
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Apply by March 23
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies