Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking July 29, 2015, that seeks to clarify that the duty to record work-related injuries and illnesses is an ongoing obligation throughout the five-year period during which employers are required to keep the records.
The proposed rule aims to reverse a 2012 federal appeals court decision ruling that employers can only be cited for failing to record injuries or illnesses within six months of when the recording is required.
“The duty to record an injury or illness continues for as long as the employer must keep records of the recordable injury or illness; the duty does not expire just because the employer fails to create the necessary records when first required to do so,” OSHA said. The proposed amendments to the recordkeeping regulations add no new compliance obligations, the agency said. “The proposal would not require employers to make records of any injuries or illnesses for which records are not currently required to be made.”
Responsibility to Record
Covered employers are required to record information about certain injuries and illnesses occurring in their workplaces on the OSHA 300 log and 301 report, and to make that information available to employees, OSHA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Employers must record work-related injuries and illnesses that meet certain criteria, including those that result in death, loss of consciousness, days away from work, restricted work activity or job transfer, medical treatment beyond first aid, or a diagnosis of a significant injury or illness by a physician.
OSHA’s position has been that an employer’s duty to record an injury or illness continues for the full duration of the record-retention-and-access period: five years after the end of the calendar year in which the injury or illness became recordable and that recordkeeping violations are continuing violations.
Therefore, OSHA is asserting that it can cite employers for recordkeeping violations for up to six months after the five-year retention period expires without running afoul of the statute of limitations outlined in Section 9(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act.
The Volks Decisions
The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission in 2011 upheld OSHA’s position on the continuing nature of recordkeeping violations in Secretary of Labor v. AKM LLC (Volks I).
That decision was reversed April 6, 2012, by a panel of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in AKM LLC v. Sec’y of Labor (Volks II).
The court disagreed with the commission and held that OSHA is not authorized by statute to cite an employer for a recordkeeping violation more than six months after the recording failure.
“The Volks II decision has led to a need for OSHA to clarify employers’ obligations under its recordkeeping regulations and to elaborate on its understanding of the statutory basis for those obligations,” OSHA said.
The agency is accepting comments on the proposed rule through Sept. 27, 2015.
Roy Maurer is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
Follow him @SHRMRoy
SHRM OnlineSafety & Security page
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies