Not a Member? Get access to HR news and resources that you can trust.
Make sure supervisors know these common justifications for harassment are unacceptable.
Is your employee handbook ready for the changing world of work? With SHRM’s Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
60+ new SHRM Seminar dates in 10 U.S. cities and virtually.
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader -- Join us in Phoenix, AZ, October 2-4, 2017.
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has released a new set of standards to help employers determine whether interns must be paid the minimum wage and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) for their services. The standards apply only to those interns working for “for-profit” private sector employers.
The FLSA defines the term “employ” broadly, and most internships in the “for-profit” private sector are viewed as employment rather than training. Interns in the “for-profit” private sector who qualify as employees rather than trainees typically must be paid at least the minimum wage and overtime compensation for work that exceeds 40 hours per week.
There are some circumstances under which individuals who participate in “for-profit” private sector internships or training programs may do so without compensation. The Supreme Court has held that the FLSA definition of work cannot be interpreted so as to make a person whose work serves only his or her own interest an employee of another who provides aid or instruction. This may apply to interns who receive training for their own educational benefit if the training meets certain criteria.
The DOL fact sheet provides a list of six criteria that must be applied when determining whether an internship should be considered training rather than employment:
If all of these factors apply, an employment relationship does not exist under the FLSA and the law’s minimum wage and overtime provisions do not apply to the intern.
Educational vs. Work Environment
The more an internship program is structured around a classroom or academic experience, such as with college or university oversight of for-credit programs as opposed to the employer’s actual operations, the more likely the internship will be viewed as an educational experience rather than employment. And the more the internship provides the individual with skills that can be used in multiple employment settings, as opposed to one employer’s worksite-specific skills, the more likely the intern would be viewed as receiving training. Under these circumstances the intern does not perform the routine work of the business on a regular and recurring basis and the business is not dependent upon the work of the intern; thus, the employer is not obligated to pay the intern for services, said DOL. Likewise, if the employer is providing job shadowing opportunities that allow an intern to learn certain functions under the close, constant supervision of regular employees but the intern performs minimal or no work, the activity is more likely to be viewed as a bona fide education experience.
The internship should be of a fixed duration established prior to the outset of the internship. Further, unpaid internships generally should not be used by the employer as a trial period for individuals seeking employment at the conclusion of the internship period. If an intern is placed with the employer for a trial period with the expectation that he or she will then be hired on a permanent basis, that individual generally would be considered an employee under the FLSA.
If interns are engaged in the operations of the employer or are performing productive work (e.g., filing, other clerical work or customer assistance), however, then the fact that they might be receiving some benefits in the form of a new skill or improved work habits will not exclude them from the FLSA’s minimum wage and overtime requirements because their employers benefit from their work as well. Also, if the intern receives the same level of supervision as the employer’s regular workforce, this would suggest an employment relationship rather than training.
Likewise, if an employer uses interns as substitutes for regular workers or to augment its workforce during specific periods when workers might have been hired instead, these interns will be viewed as employees and entitled compensation under the FLSA, the department states.
Some experts warn that these new standards might cause employers to provide fewer internship opportunities for students, while others see them as a way to curb some employers’ reliance on internships as free labor. However, some of the “sticking points” related to internship programs were addressed in an in-depth article featured in the February 2010 issue of NACE Journal, published by the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE).
It is “always difficult for employers to treat interns as nonemployee trainees or volunteers,” wrote George C. Hlavac and Edward J. Easterly, attorneys in the Labor and Employment Law Department of the firm Tallman, Hudders & Sorrentino, P.C. “This is because, generally, an employer treats its interns the same way as the rest of its employees. The interns perform the same or similar work performed by other employees, they are supervised and directed like other employees and are often provided with a financial or other benefit at the direction of the employer.”
But in light of the DOL’s new standards, they wrote, “As a practical matter, employers need to review all aspects of the relationship before determining that the intern is not an employee, thereby absolving the employer of many of the legal responsibilities to that individual.”
However, said Nancy Hammer, the Society for Human Resource Management’s manager of regulatory and judicial affairs, “Internships are a valuable way for young people to gain workplace skills, especially at a time when employers are concerned about a lack of skills among new entrants to the workforce.” She continued: “Given the Labor Department’s enhanced enforcement in this area, HR professionals should take this opportunity to review their internship policies to ensure they track DOL requirements.”
Experts offer employers recommendations for implementing internship programs:
Finally, they advised that because of the variety of laws and legal issues that might arise, internship programs should be reviewed by counsel prior to implementation.
The DOL plans to continue reviewing the need for additional guidance on internships in the public and nonprofit sectors. For additional information, visit the DOL’s Wage and Hour Division web site or call the agency’s toll-free information and helpline, 1-866-4USWAGE (1-866-487-9243).
Theresa Minton-Eversole is an online editor/manager for SHRM.
Some Internships Might Be Challenged as Off-the-Clock Work, SHRM Online Legal Issues, April 9, 2010
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
CA Resources at Your Fingertips
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies
[/_catalogs/masterpage/SHRMCore/Main.master][Title][SHRM Online - Society for Human Resource Management]