Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018!
SHRM board member David Windley discusses how unconscious bias can derail workplace diversity efforts.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 12 cities across the U.S. this spring.
#SHRM18 will expand your perspective – on your organization, on your career, and on the way you approach HR. Join us in Chicago June 17-20, 2018
Official says employers should expect criminal enforcement this year
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is planning criminal enforcement actions against employers that agree not to compete for workers, a top official announced.
Makan Delrahim, the assistant attorney general for the department's antitrust division, said that his team has been reviewing potential violations of the antitrust law prohibiting nonpoaching agreements and that added enforcement actions will be taken this year. Delrahim was speaking to attendees of a conference sponsored by the Antitrust Research Foundation on Jan. 19, according to Bloomberg Law.
Delrahim said that even after his office and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued an antitrust guidance for HR professionals in October 2016—affirming that it is against the law for employers to agree to fix wages or to not hire one another's workers—employers have continued to violate the law. They risk severe sanctions, including criminal prosecution.
"In the coming couple of months, you will see some announcements, and, to be honest with you, I've been shocked about how many of these there are, but they're real," he said.
"While no criminal charges have yet been brought against employers for entering no-poach or wage-fixing agreements, that is about to change," said Dee Bansal, an attorney in the Washington, D.C., office of law firm Cooley LLP. "The Trump administration has voiced support of this Obama-era policy."
Delrahim clarified that the DOJ might bring civil complaints against the parties in a nonpoaching agreement for conduct before the 2016 guidance was issued but will "treat conduct as criminal" if it continued after the DOJ's policy announcement.
[SHRM members-only online discussion platform: SHRM Connect]
"Workers are entitled to the benefit of competition for their services, and firms should avoid reaching agreements with competing employers that would fix wages or other terms of employment, or prevent them from competing for workers," the FTC said in the guidance. "HR professionals often are in the best position to ensure that their companies' hiring practices comply with the antitrust laws. In particular, HR professionals can implement safeguards to prevent inappropriate discussions or agreements with other firms."
The DOJ can bring a criminal prosecution against individuals, the company or both, depending on the facts of the case. The guidance states that an individual likely is breaking the law if he or she reaches an agreement with someone at another company about:
Even discussions—without an oral or written agreement—to limit employee compensation or recruiting may lead to an investigation.
In October 2016, Phillip Warren, a partner in the San Francisco office of Covington & Burling, said the guidance was a major shift in policy. "This change makes it important for companies to promptly audit their human resources policies and practices to identify any potentially illegal conduct and to take quick action. Early discovery of potential problems will put companies in the best position to formulate an optimal strategy―to mitigate risk or even avoid criminal exposure altogether," he said.
The FTC guidance outlined additional actions to guard against, including:
Was this article useful? SHRM offers thousands of tools, templates and other exclusive member benefits, including compliance updates, sample policies, HR expert advice, education discounts, a growing online member community and much more. Join/Renew Now and let SHRM help you work smarter.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies