Get access to the exclusive HR Resources you need to succeed in 2018.
Sign up for free email newsletters and get more SHRM content delivered to your inbox.
Is your employee handbook keeping up with the changing world of work? With SHRM's Employee Handbook Builder get peace of mind that your handbook is up-to-date.
Build competencies, establish credibility and advance your career—while earning PDCs—at SHRM Seminars in 14 cities across the U.S. this fall.
Gain the skills you need to rise to the next level in your career. Jon us at SHRM's Leadership Development Forum, October 2-3 in Boston.
Members may download one copy of our sample forms and templates for your personal use within your organization. Please note that all such forms and policies should be reviewed by your legal counsel for compliance with applicable law, and should be modified to suit your organization’s culture, industry, and practices. Neither members nor non-members may reproduce such samples in any other way (e.g., to republish in a book or use for a commercial purpose) without SHRM’s permission. To request permission for specific items, click on the “reuse permissions” button on the page where you find the item.
A state employee who was fired for sarcastic posts on Facebook lost her First Amendment claim on Nov. 7, 2013.
Jennifer Shepherd, a child protective services worker at the Oregon Department of Human Services (DHS), went to juvenile court six to eight times per month on behalf of children who she had determined should be removed from their home because they weren’t safe there.
But her Facebook posts suggested she was a disgruntled employee.
“So today I noticed a self-sufficiency client getting into a newer BMW. What am I doing wrong here? I think I need to quit my job and get on TANF” [Temporary Assistance for Needy Families],” she commented on her Facebook page. “Almost every client home I go into has a gigantic flat screen TV. I ask how they paid for it, and it’s usually with their tax returns … yet they don’t pay taxes! You should let me know when you send people to jail and I can get their ‘benefits’ turned off.”
And in another post, she said, “I was listening to the radio and they were making up rules for society. Here are my rules:
The posts were seen by Shepherd’s Facebook friends, including defense attorney Mingo Vidrio and Polk County Circuit Court Judge Fred Avera. A DHS manager forwarded the posts to Ken McGee, an HR manager.
McGee thought the posts reflected Shepherd’s opinions, and he did not find them humorous or ironic. He thought her “rules for society” post showed her own bias, which, in her position, she was supposed to put aside.
Shepherd was placed on leave and then terminated.
Deputy District Attorney Max Wall said the content on Facebook “would also likely require questioning as to her viewpoints on the abuse of children each time plaintiff took the stand in such a case and would likely hamper current and future cases.”
Department of Justice Senior Assistant Attorney General Brian Raymer believed that Shepherd was “terminally and irrevocably compromised” and said her Facebook posts would prevent him from ever calling her as a witness. In his opinion, her statements would create trust issues with DHS clients and would reflect adversely on DHS in the relevant local community.
Shepherd argued that there was “no evidence that her speech actually caused disruption in the workplace and her credibility as a witness was never actually impeached.” But the court didn’t buy it.
“Wall’s and Raymer’s declarations establish actual, material and substantial disruption to their working relationships with plaintiff,” the court said. “Even without actually having her testimony impeached at a hearing, plaintiff’s Facebook posts caused Wall and Raymer to doubt her ability to be effective.
“That doubt, even without anything more, is a disruption to those working relationships and is evidence that her ability to perform that aspect of her job would be impaired. Second, because plaintiff was placed on administrative leave and unavailable to Wall or Raymer during her leave and then she was terminated, there was no opportunity for Wall or Raymer to use plaintiff as a witness.”
The federal district court concluded, “The government employer does not have to compromise its function by allowing the employee to actually cause disruption or fail to perform his or her job duties in order to establish an impairment in efficient operations.”
The case is
Shepherd v. McGee, No. 03:12-cv-02218-HZ (D. Ore. 2013).
Allen Smith, J.D., is the manager of workplace content for SHRM. Follow him @SHRMlegaleditor.
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please sign in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Become a SHRM Member
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 10,000 companies