NEW Professional Member Special>>> Save $20 and receive a SHRM tote bag
More companies are recognizing the importance of giving employees the time and space they need to navigate personal loss.
Save $20 on a New Professional Membership and receive a FREE Tote bag when you join SHRM today!
Virtual SHRM-CP/SHRM-SCP Certification Prep Seminars kick off September 12 and fill up fast!
Expand your influence and learn how to become an effective leader. Join us in Phoenix, AZ | OCTOBER 2 - 4, 2017
Not all types of anti-harassment training are equal.
Eden King, an associate professor of psychology at George Mason University, outlined before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) June 16, 2015, some of the characteristics of more successful anti-harassment training.
Training is most likely to be effective, she testified before the EEOC Task Force on the Study of Harassment in the Workplace, if it:
Additionally, research conducted by King has concluded that:
Goal setting can enhance training, King added. She said:
Empathy and Civility
It also helps to have trainees participate in a brief writing activity in which they try to adopt the perspective of a stigmatized co-worker. This exercise can result in trainees experiencing more empathy and better attitudes and behaviors toward the stigmatized group, King noted.
As for standing up to harassers, research shows that bystanders can be more effective in confronting prejudice than the targets of harassment themselves, she said.
However, Lilia Cortina, a professor of psychology and women’s studies at the University of Michigan, had a word of caution about drawing lessons from studies on harassment, saying, “It is important to note … that each of the training studies conducted to date has evaluated a completely different sexual harassment training program, limiting generalizing and making it difficult to arrive at definitive conclusions.”
That said, Cortina called for an emphasis on civility, remarking that “incivility might sometimes act as a sort of ‘gateway drug,’ being a precursor to more egregious forms of workplace abuse.”
Policies, Anti-Retaliation Provisions
Two things that have been shown to lower harassment rates are well-crafted anti-harassment policies and employee handbook anti-retaliation provisions, testified Louise Fitzgerald, a professor emeritus of gender and women’s studies and psychology at the University of Illinois.
Anti-harassment policies should provide employees with avenues to address their complaints but too often are drafted by attorneys in overly legalistic prose, Fitzgerald asserted. And frequently “they’re buried in handbooks and forgotten,” she added.
The policies need to communicate to employees that the “organization takes this issue seriously,” she said.
As for anti-retaliation provisions, they are “one of the most important things” in combatting harassment, Fitzgerald said. So, too, is taking action against harassers.
If a large proportion of sexual harassment is being perpetrated by a small number of individuals, harassment could be reduced by just firing them, suggested Mindy Bergman, a professor of psychology at Texas A&M University.
Organizations at particular risk for harassment, Cortina said, are characterized by:
Chaotic workplaces also enhance the risk of harassment, Fitzgerald said. She noted that many harassment cases arise in the restaurant business. “Everyone runs around in the back and there’s no privacy but in the cooler, where everyone is sexually assaulted,” she remarked.
Sexual harassment remains the most common type of harassment, though reported incidents of it decreased slightly in fiscal year 2014, testified Ron Edwards, director of program research and surveys in the EEOC Office of Research, Information and Planning.
According to EEOC statistics, in the private sector there were:
Dexter Brooks, director of federal sector programs in the EEOC Office of Federal Operations, said that in the federal government, “The percentage of complaints filed alleging harassment, particularly nonsexual harassment, climbed from 31.31 percent in fiscal year 2004 to 43.62 percent in fiscal year 2013. Although federal employees have filed fewer complaints during that time period, decreasing from 19,024 to 15,226, the number of complaints alleging harassment has grown from 5,957 to 6,641.”
He concluded that, “Based on this rate of increase, harassment allegations will soon comprise half of all complaints filed” by federal employees.
Allen Smith, J.D., is the manager of workplace law content for SHRM. Follow him
You have successfully saved this page as a bookmark.
Please confirm that you want to proceed with deleting bookmark.
You have successfully removed bookmark.
Please log in as a SHRM member before saving bookmarks.
Your session has expired. Please log in again before saving bookmarks.
Please purchase a SHRM membership before saving bookmarks.
An error has occurred
Recommended for you
Join SHRM's exclusive peer-to-peer social network
SHRM’s HR Vendor Directory contains over 3,200 companies